{"id":11576,"date":"2024-08-17T10:09:50","date_gmt":"2024-08-17T08:09:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/?p=11576"},"modified":"2026-01-25T16:50:12","modified_gmt":"2026-01-25T15:50:12","slug":"references-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/references-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"R\u00e9f\u00e9rences 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"

R\u00e9f\u00e9rences
\n<\/span>References<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

Ad Her. = (1954). Rhetorica ad Herennium. Trans. by H. Caplan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.<\/p>\n

Adam J.-M. (1996). L\u2019argumentation dans le dialogue. Langue Fran\u00e7aise, 112. 31-49.<\/p>\n

Adorno Th. W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D. J. & Sanford R. N. (1950). The\u00a0 Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Row<\/p>\n

Agazzi E. (ed.) (1980). Modern Logic \u2013 A Survey. Dordrecht: Kluwer.<\/p>\n

Al-Ghazali (Bal.) = (1998). La Balance Juste. Paris: Iqra.<\/p>\n

Al-Ghazali (D\u00e9g.) = (1995). Les D\u00e9g\u00e2ts des Mots. Paris: Iqra.<\/p>\n

Amossy R. (1991). Les Id\u00e9es Re\u00e7ues. S\u00e9miologie du St\u00e9r\u00e9otype. Paris: Nathan.<\/p>\n

Amossy R. (ed.) (1999a). Images de Soi dans le Discours. La Construction de l\u2019\u00c9thos. Geneva: Delachaux & Niestl\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Amossy R. (1999b). La notion d\u2019\u00e9thos, de la rh\u00e9torique \u00e0 l\u2019analyse de discours. In Amossy R. (ed.) (1999a). 9-30.<\/p>\n

Amossy R. (2000). L\u2019Argumentation dans le Discours. Paris: Nathan.<\/p>\n

Angenot M. (2008). Dialogue de Sourds. Trait\u00e9 de Rh\u00e9torique Antilogique. Paris: Mille et Une Nuits.<\/p>\n

Anscombre J.-C. (ed.) (1995a). Th\u00e9orie des Topoi. Paris: Kim\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Anscombre J.-C. (1995b). De l\u2019argumentation dans la langue \u00e0 la th\u00e9orie des topoi. In Anscombre J.-C. (ed.) (1995a). 11-47.<\/p>\n

Anscombre J.-C. & Ducrot O. (1983). L\u2019Argumentation dans la Langue. Brussels: Mardaga.<\/p>\n

Anscombre J.-C. & Ducrot O. (1986). Informativit\u00e9 et argumentativit\u00e9. In Meyer M. (eds) (1986). 79-94.<\/p>\n

Anselm of Canterbury (Pros.) = (2000). Proslogion. In Complete Philosophical and Theological Treatises of Anselm of Canterbury. Trans. by J. Hopkins and H. Richardson. Minneapolis: The Arthur J. Banning Press. http:\/\/jasper-hopkins.info\/proslogion.pdf<\/p>\n

Antiphon (Disc.) = (1923). Discours. Ed. and trans. by L. Gernet. Paris: Les Belles-Lettres. Apoth\u00e9loz D. & Mi\u00e9ville D. (1989). Coh\u00e9rence et discours argument\u00e9. In M. Charolles (ed.) (1989). The Resolution of Discourse. Hambourg, Buske. 68-87.<\/p>\n

Arendt H. (1958). What was authority? In Friedrich C. (ed.) (1958). Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.<\/p>\n

Arendt H. [1951] = (1976). The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego: Harcourt Brace<\/p>\n

Aristotle (PA) = Prior Analytics. Trans. by A. J. Jenkinson. http:\/\/classics.mit.edu\/\/Aristotle\/prior.html (12-12-2017).<\/p>\n

Aristotle (Pol.) = (1855). Politics. Vol. 1. Trans. by B. Jowett. Oxford: Clarendon Press.<\/p>\n

Aristotle (Post. An.) = (1960). Posteriors Analytics. Trans. by H. Trendennick. In Aristotle,<\/p>\n

Posteriors Analytics \u2013 Topica. Cambridge, MA, London, Eng.: Harvard UP.<\/p>\n

Aristotle (Rhet.) =
\n\u2014 (2005) Rhetoric. In Aristotle, Poetics and Rhetoric. Introd. and notes by E. Garver. Rhetoric trans. by W. Rhys Roberts (1924). Poetics, trans. by S. H. Butcher (1911). New York: Barnes and Nobles.<\/p>\n

\u2014 (1926). Rhetoric. Trans. by J. H. Freese. London: William Heinemann & New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.<\/p>\n

Aristotle (Soph.) = (1955). On Sophistical Refutations. Trans. by E. S. Forster. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard UP. https:\/\/ebooks.adelaide.edu.au\/a\/aristotle\/sophistical\/<\/p>\n

Aristotle (Top.) = (1960). Topica. In Aristotle, Posteriors Analytics \u2013 Topica. Trans. by E. S. Forster. Cambridge, MA & London, England: Harvard UP.<\/p>\n

Arnauld A. & Nicole P. [1662] = (1850). Logic, or The Art of Thinking, Being the Port-Royal Logic. Trans. and introd. by Th. S. Baynes. Edinburgh: Sutherland and Know.<\/p>\n

Atkinson J.-M. & Heritage J. (eds) (1984). Structures of Social Action – Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, MA: CUP. 79-112.<\/p>\n

Auroux S. (1995). Argumentation et anti-rh\u00e9torique. La math\u00e9matisation de la logique classique. Herm\u00e8s 15. 129-144.<\/p>\n

Auroux (1990). Encyclop\u00e9die Philosophique Universelle. Vol. 2: Les Notions Philosophiques. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

Auroux S. (ed.) (1992). Histoire des id\u00e9es linguistiques. Brussels: Mardaga.<\/p>\n

Austin J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford UP.<\/p>\n

Bacon F. [1620] = (1901). Novum Organum. Ed. by J. Devey. New York: Collier and Son.<\/p>\n

Bailly A. [1901]. Abr\u00e9g\u00e9 du Dictionnaire Grec-Fran\u00e7ais. Paris: Hachette. http:\/\/home.scarlet.be\/tabularium\/bailly\/index.html<\/p>\n

Baker M. J. (1996). Argumentation et co-construction des connaissances. Interaction et Cognitions 2, 3. 157-191.<\/p>\n

Bakhtin = Bakhtine M. (1978). Esth\u00e9tique et Th\u00e9orie du Roman. Trans. by D. Olivier. Paris: Gallimard.<\/p>\n

Balacheff N. (1999). Apprendre la preuve. In Sallantin J. & Szczeciniarz J. J. (eds.) (1999). 197-236.<\/p>\n

Barthes R. (1970). L\u2019ancienne rh\u00e9torique. Aide-m\u00e9moire. Communications, 16. 195-226.<\/p>\n

Barthes R. (1977) = (1996). Inaugural Lecture at the Coll\u00e8ge de France. In Kearney R & Rainwater M. (1996). The Continental Philosophy Reader. New York: Routledge. 364-377.<\/p>\n

Bassham G. (2003). Linked and independant premises. A new analysis. In Eemeren, F.H van, Blair J. A., Willard C. A., Snoeck-Henkemans A. F. (eds) (2003). 69-73.<\/p>\n

Beardsley M. C. [1950] = (1975). Thinking Straight. Principles of Reasoning for Readers and Writers. New York: Prentice-Hall.<\/p>\n

Benett B. S. (2005). Hermagoras of Temnos. In Ballif M. & Moran M. G. (eds) (2005) Classical Rhetorics and Rhetoricians: Critical Studies and Sources. Westport, CT: Praeger.<\/p>\n

Benoit W. L. (1987). On Aristotle example. Philosohy and Rhetoric 20. 261-267.<\/p>\n

Benoit W. L. & Lindsey J. J. (1987). Argument fields and forms of argument in natural language. In van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Blair, J. A., Willard, C. A. (eds.) (1987). 215-224.<\/p>\n

Bentham J., [1824] = (1962). The Book of Fallacies. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Published by J. Bowring. Vol. 2. New York, Russell & Russell.<\/p>\n

Benveniste \u00c9. [1958] = (1971). Subjectivity in language. In Problems in General Linguistics. Trans. by M. E. Meek. Miami, University of Miami Press. 223-230.<\/p>\n

Benveniste \u00c9. [1959] = (1971) The correlations of tense in the French verb. In Problems in General Linguistics. Trans. by M. E. Meek. Miami: University of Miami Press. 205-248.<\/p>\n

Benveniste \u00c9. [1969] = (1973). The censor and auctoritas. In Indo-European Language and Society. Trans. by E. Palmaer and J. Lallot. Miami: University of Miami Press. http:\/\/chs.harvard.edu\/CHS\/article\/display\/3961<\/p>\n

Berlioz J. (1980). Le r\u00e9cit efficace: L\u2019exemplum au service de la pr\u00e9dication. Rh\u00e9torique et Histoire. M\u00e9langes de l\u2019\u00c9cole Fran\u00e7aise de Rome, Moyen \u00c2ge – Temps Modernes, 92. 113-146.<\/p>\n

Bernays E. L. (1928). Propaganda. New York: Horace Liveright.<\/p>\n

Bernier R. (1980). Le r\u00f4le de l\u2019analogie dans l\u2019explication en biologie. In A. Lichnerowicz & al. (eds) (1980). 167-193.<\/p>\n

Bible = The Bible. www.biblegateway.com<\/p>\n

Billig M. [1987] = (1989). Arguing and Thinking. A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP & Paris: \u00c9ditions de la MSH.<\/p>\n

Bilmes J. (1991). Toward a theory of argument in conversation. The preference for disagreement. In van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R., Blair J. A. & Willard C. (eds) (1991) 462-469.<\/p>\n

Bird O. (1961). The re-discovery of the topics: Professor Toulmin\u2019s inference warrant. Mind 70. 76-96.<\/p>\n

Bitzer L. (1959). Aristotle\u2019s Enthymeme Revisited. Quarterly Journal of Speech 45. 399-408.<\/p>\n

Bitzer L. F. [1968] = (1974) The rhetorical situation. In Fisher W. R. (ed.) (1974). Rhetoric: a Tradition in Transition. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State UP. 247-260.<\/p>\n

Black M. (1962). Models and Metaphor. Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.<\/p>\n

Black M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.) (1979). 19-43.<\/p>\n

Blair J. A & Johnson R. (eds) (2011). Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning. London: College Publications.<\/p>\n

Blair J. A. (2012). Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation. Dordrecht: Springer.<\/p>\n

Blair J. A. & Johnson R. H. (eds) (1980). Informal Logic: The First International Symposium. Inverness: Edgepress.<\/p>\n

Blanch\u00e9 R. (1970). L\u2019axiomatique, Paris: PUF<\/p>\n

Blanch\u00e9 R. (1973). Le raisonnement. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

Boeckh P. A. [1886] = (1988). Philological hermeneutics. In Mueller-Vollmer K. (ed.) (1988). 132-147.<\/p>\n

Boethius, Top. = (1978). De Topicis Differentiis. Trans. Notes and Essays by E. Stump. Ithaca: Cornell University Press,<\/p>\n

Bonhomme M. (1998). Les Figures Cl\u00e9s du Discours. Paris: Le Seuil.<\/p>\n

Booth W. C. (1974). Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n

Borel M.-J., Grize J.-B. & Mi\u00e9ville D. (1983). Essai de Logique Naturelle. Berne, Peter Lang.<\/p>\n

Bori P. C. [1987] = (1991) L\u2019Interpr\u00e9tation Infinie. Trans. by F. Vial. Paris: Le Cerf.<\/p>\n

Bornscheuer L. (1976). Topik. Zur Struktur der gesellschaftlichen Einbildungskraft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.<\/p>\n

Bossuet J.-B. [1677] = (1990). Logique du Dauphin. Paris: \u00c9ditions Universitaires.<\/p>\n

Bouamrane C. & Gardet L. (1984). Panorama de la Pens\u00e9e Islamique. Paris: Sindbad.<\/p>\n

Boudon R. (1990). L\u2019art de se Persuader des Id\u00e9es Douteuses, Fragiles ou Fausses. Paris: Le Seuil.<\/p>\n

Bourdieu P. (1982). Ce que Parler Veut Dire. L\u2019\u00c9conomie des \u00c9changes Linguistiques, Paris:
\nFayard.<\/p>\n

Bouveresse J. [1999]. Prodiges et Vertiges De l\u2019Analogie. Paris: Raisons d\u2019Agir.<\/p>\n

Bouverot D. (ed.) (1993). Rh\u00e9torique et Sciences du Langage. Verbum, 1-2-3.<\/p>\n

Bouvier A. (1999). Philosophie des Sciences Sociales – Un point de vue argumentativiste en sciences sociales. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

Bouvier A. (ed.) (1994-1995). Argumentation et Sciences sociales, (I) et (II). L\u2019Ann\u00e9e Sociologique, 44-45.<\/p>\n

Boyer A., Vignaux G. (ed.) (1995). Argumentation et Rh\u00e9torique, (I) & (II). Herm\u00e8s 15-16.<\/p>\n

Brandt P.-Y. & Apoth\u00e9loz D. (1991). L\u2019articulation raisons-conclusion dans la contre-argumentation. La N\u00e9gation. Travaux du Cercle de Recherches S\u00e9miologiques, 59). 88-102.<\/p>\n

Br\u00e9mond Cl. (1982). D\u00e9composition syntagmatique: Les parties de l\u2019exemplum. In Br\u00e9mond Cl., & al. (1982). 113-143.<\/p>\n

Br\u00e9mond Cl., Le Goff J. & Schmitt J-Cl. (1982). L\u2019Exemplum. Turnhout: Brepols.<\/p>\n

Breton Ph. (1996). L\u2019Argumentation dans la Communication. Paris: La D\u00e9couverte.<\/p>\n

Breton Ph. (1997). La Parole Manipul\u00e9e. Paris: La D\u00e9couverte.<\/p>\n

Breuer D. & Schanze H. (eds) (1981). Topik. M\u00fcnchen: Wilhelm Fink.<\/p>\n

Brody B. A. (1967). Logical terms, Glossary of \u2014. In Edwards P (ed.) (1967). Vol. 5. 57-77.<\/p>\n

Brown R. W. & Levinson S. (1978). Politeness. Some Universal en Language Usage. Cambridge, CUP.<\/p>\n

Brunschwig J. (1967). Introduction. In Aristote, Topiques. Paris: Les Belles-Lettres.<\/p>\n

B\u00fchler K. [1933] = (1976). Die Axiomatik der Sprachwissenschaften. Einleitung und Kommentar von E. Str\u00f6ker. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klosterman.<\/p>\n

Burke K. (1945). A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.<\/p>\n

Burke K. (1950). A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.<\/p>\n

Buty Chr. & Plantin Chr. (2009). Argumenter en Classe de Sciences. Du d\u00e9bat \u00e0 l\u2019Apprentissage. Lyon: INRP.<\/p>\n

Carel M. (1995). Trop: Argumentation interne, argumentation externe et positivit\u00e9. In Anscombre I. C. (ed.) Th\u00e9orie des Topoi. Paris: Kim\u00e9. 177-206.<\/p>\n

Carel M. (1999). S\u00e9mantique discursive et s\u00e9mantique logique: Le cas de mais. Mod\u00e8les linguistiques, XX, 1. 133-144.<\/p>\n

Carel M. (2011). L\u2019Entrelacement Argumentatif. Lexique, Discours et Blocs S\u00e9mantiques. Paris: Champion.<\/p>\n

Casagrande C., Vecchio S. [1987] = (1991). Les p\u00e9ch\u00e9s de la langue. Discipline et \u00e9thique de la parole dans la culture m\u00e9di\u00e9vale. Pref. by J. Le Goff. Trans. by Ph. Baillet. Paris: Le Cerf.<\/p>\n

Cassin B. (2004). Vocabulaire Europ\u00e9en des Philosophies – Dictionnaire des Intraduisibles. Paris: Le Seuil.<\/p>\n

CD = Cambridge Dictionary, http:\/\/dictionary.cambridge.org<\/p>\n

Chabrol Cl. & Radu M. (2008). Psychologie de la Communication et de la Persuasion. Brussels: De Boeck.<\/p>\n

Chaignet A. E., 1888). La Rh\u00e9torique et Son Histoire. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints.<\/p>\n

Chakhotine S. [1939] = (1940). The Rape of the Masses; The Psychology of Totalitarian Political Propaganda. Trans. by E. W. Dickes. New York: Alliance Book \/ London: Routledge.<\/p>\n

Charaudeau P. & Maingueneau D. (2002). Dictionnaire d\u2019Analyse du Discours. Paris: Le Seuil.<\/p>\n

Chenique F. (1975). \u00c9l\u00e9ments de Logique Classique. T. 1. L\u2019Art de Penser et deJjuger. T. 2. L\u2019Art de Raisonner. Paris: Dunod.<\/p>\n

Cicero (Acad.) = The Academic Questions. Trans. by C. D. Yonge. The University of Adelaide. https:\/\/ebooks.adelaide.edu.au\/c\/cicero\/academic-questions\/ (08-17-2017)<\/p>\n

Cicero (De Inv.) = (2006). On Invention. Trans. by H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge MA & London England: Harvard UP.<\/p>\n

Cicero (De Or.) = (1878). De Oratore. Translated or edited by J. S. Watson. New York, Harper. Quoted after Cicero, On Oratory and Orators. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois UP (1970).<\/p>\n

Cicero (Part.) = De Partitione Oratoria. In Cicero, IV. Trans. by H. Rackham. First published (1942). Cambridge MA, London England: Harvard UP.<\/p>\n

Cicero (Top.) = (2006) Topics. In Cicero, On Invention \u2014 Best Kind of Orators \u2013 Topics. Trans. by H. M. Hubble. Cambridge MA, London: Harvard UP. (2006).<\/p>\n

Condillac E. B. de [1976] = (1981). Traiter de l\u2019Art de Raisonner. Paris: Vrin.<\/p>\n

Conein B., de Fornel M. & Qu\u00e9r\u00e9 L. (eds) (1990). Les Formes de la Conversation. Vol. 1. Paris: CNET.<\/p>\n

Conley T. M. (1984). The enthymeme in perspective. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70. 168-187.<\/p>\n

Cooper J. M. (1996). An Aristotelian Theory of the Emotions. In A. O. Rorty (ed.) Essays on Aristotle\u2019s Rh\u00e9toric. Berkeley: University of California Press. 238-257.<\/p>\n

Cosnier J. (1994). Psychologie des \u00c9motions et des Sentiments. Paris: Retz & Nathan.<\/p>\n

Cousin J. (1976). Note [to Quintilien Institution Oratoire V, 10]. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.<\/p>\n

Cox J. R. & Willard C. A. (eds) (1982). Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.<\/p>\n

Curtius E. R. [1948] = (1953). European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. by W. Trask. Princeton: Princeton University Press.<\/p>\n

D.c = Dictionary.com. http:\/\/www.dictionary.com<\/p>\n

Damasio A. R. (1994). Descartes’s Error \u2014 Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.<\/p>\n

Danblon E. (2005). La Fonction Persuasive. Anthropologie du Discours Rh\u00e9torique: Origines et Actualit\u00e9. Paris: Armand Colin.<\/p>\n

Dascal M. (2009). Colonizing and decolonizing minds. In I. Ku\u00e7uradi (ed.) Papers of the 2007 World Philosophy Day. Ankara: Philosophical Society of Turkey. 308-332.<\/p>\n

Davidson D. (1978). What metaphors mean. In Sacks, S. (ed.) (1978). 29-45.<\/p>\n

De Vries E., Lund K., & Baker M. J. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 11, 1. 63-103.<\/p>\n

Declerq G. (1993). L\u2019Art d\u2019Argumenter. Structures Rh\u00e9toriques et Litt\u00e9raires. Paris: \u00c9ditions Universitaires.<\/p>\n

Declerq G. (2002). Avatars de l\u2019argument ad hominem. \u00c9ristique, sophistique, rh\u00e9torique. In M. Murat, M., G. Declercq & J. Dangel (eds) (2002). La Parole Pol\u00e9mique, Paris: Champion. 327-376.<\/p>\n

Descartes R. [1628] = (1954). Rules for the Direction of the Mind. Trans. by E. Anscombe & P.T. Geach. In E. Anscombe & P. T. Geach (1954). Descartes. Philosophical Writings. A Selection. London: Nelson.<\/p>\n

Descartes R. [1637] = (1987). Discours de la M\u00e9thode. Introd. and notes by \u00c9. Gilson. Paris: Vrin.<\/p>\n

Descartes R. [1641] = (1911). Meditations on First Philosophy. In The Philosophical Works of Ren\u00e9 Descartes. Trans. by E. S. Haldane. Cambridge: CUP.<\/p>\n

Descartes R. [1649] = (1989). The Passions of the Soul. Introd. by G. Rodis-Lewis. Trans. by S. Voss. Indianapolis, IN & Cambridge, MA: Hackett.<\/p>\n

Dicolat = Dictionnaire latin-fran\u00e7ais.
\nhttp:\/\/www2c.aclille.fr\/verlaine\/College\/Projets\/Latin\/dictionnaire_fr_latin\/Dico-lat-C.html.<\/p>\n

Dic = Dictionary.com, http:\/\/www.dictionary.com<\/p>\n

Dieter A. O. L. (1950). \u2018Stasis\u2019. Speech Monographs, 17, 4. 345-69.<\/p>\n

Domenach J. M. [1950] = (1979). La Propagande Politique. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

Dominicy M. (s.d.). Perelman et l\u2019\u00c9cole de Bruxelles. www.philodroit.be\/spip.php?page=article&id_article=452&lang=fr. (09-20 -2013)<\/p>\n

Dopp J. (1967). Notions de Logique Formelle. 2nd revised ed. Louvain & Paris: B\u00e9atrice Nauwelaerts.<\/p>\n

Douay-Soublin F. (1992). La rh\u00e9torique en Europe \u00e0 travers son enseignement. In S. Auroux (ed.), T. 2. 467-507.<\/p>\n

Douay-Soublin F. (1999). La Rh\u00e9torique en France au XIXe si\u00e8cle \u00e0 travers ses pratiques et ses institutions: Restauration, renaissance, remise en cause. In M. Fumaroli (ed.) (1999). 1071-1214.<\/p>\n

Doury M. (1997). Le D\u00e9bat Immobile – L\u2019Argumentation dans le D\u00e9bat M\u00e9diatique sur les Parasciences. Paris: Kim\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Doury M. (2000). La r\u00e9futation par accusation d\u2019\u00e9motion. In Plantin Chr., Doury M., & Traverso V. (eds) (2010). 265-277.<\/p>\n

Doury M. (2003). L\u2019\u00e9valuation des arguments dans les discours ordinaires. Le cas de l\u2019accusation d\u2019amalgame. Langage et soci\u00e9t\u00e9, 105. 9-37.<\/p>\n

Doury M. (2006). Evaluating analogy. Toward a descriptive approach to argumentative norms. In Houtlosser P. & van Rees A. (eds) (2006). Considering Pragma-Dialectics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 35-49.<\/p>\n

Dubucs J. (1995). Les arguments d\u00e9faisables. Argumentation et Rh\u00e9torique I. Herm\u00e8s 15. 271-290.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. s.d. Quelques raisons de distinguer \u2018locuteurs\u2019 et \u2018\u00e9nonciateurs\u2019.
\nwww.hum.au.dk\/romansk\/polyfoni\/Polyphonie_III\/Oswald_Ducrot.htm. (09-20-2013).<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. (1972). Dire et ne pas Dire. Tours, Hermann.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. (1973). La Preuve et le Dire. Paris: Mame.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. (1975). \u2018Je trouve que\u2019. Semantikos 1. 62-88. Re-published in Ducrot & al.
\n(1980). 57-92.<\/p>\n

Ducrot, O. (1980). Les \u00c9chelles Argumentatives. Paris: Minuit.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. (1984). Le Dire et le Dit. Paris: Minuit.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. (1988). Polifon\u00eda y Argumentaci\u00f3n. Cali, Universidad del Valle.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. (1993). Les topoi dans la Th\u00e9orie de l\u2019Argumentation dans la Langue. In C. Plantin (ed.) (1993). 233-248.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. (1995). Les modificateurs d\u00e9r\u00e9alisants. Journal of Pragmatics, 24. 145-165.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. & al. (1980). Les Mots du Discours. Paris: Minuit.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. & al. (1982). Justement, l\u2019inversion argumentative. Lexique, 1. 151-164.<\/p>\n

Ducrot O. (ed.) (1966). Logique et linguistique. Langages 2. 3-30.<\/p>\n

Dufour M. (2008). Argumenter – Cours de Logique Informelle. Paris: Armand Colin.<\/p>\n

Dumarsais C. Ch. [1730] = (1988). Des Tropes ou des Diff\u00e9rents Sens dans Lesquels on Peut Prendre un M\u00eame Mot dans une M\u00eame Langue. Ed. by F. Douay-Soublin. Paris: Flammarion.<\/p>\n

Dumoncel, J.-C. (1990). \u00c9vidence. In Auroux, S. (1990). 908.<\/p>\n

Dupleix S. [1607] = (1984). La Logique, ou Art de Discourir et Raisonner. Paris: Fayard.<\/p>\n

Dupont F. (2000). L\u2019Orateur Sans Visage. Essai sur l\u2019Acteur Romain et son Masque. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

Dupr\u00e9el E. (1939). Esquisse d\u2019une Philosophie des Valeurs. Paris: Alcan.<\/p>\n

Dupriez B. (1984). Gradus. Les Proc\u00e9d\u00e9s Litt\u00e9raires \u2013 Dictionnaire. Paris: UGE.<\/p>\n

Duval R. (1992-1993). Argumenter, d\u00e9montrer, expliquer. Continuit\u00e9 ou rupture explicative? \u00ab petit x \u00bb 31. 37-61.<\/p>\n

Duval R. (1995). S\u00e9miosis et Pens\u00e9e Humaine. Registres S\u00e9miotiques et Apprentissages Intellectuels. Berne: Peter Lang.<\/p>\n

Edwards P. (ed.) (1967). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: MacMillan & London: Collier.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Blair J. A., Willard C. A., & Snoeck-Henkemans A. F. (eds) (2003). Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of argumentation. Amsterdam: SICSAT.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Blair, J. A., Willard, C. A. & Garssen, B. (eds.) (2007). Proceedings ofthe Sixth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SICSAT.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Garssen B. (2009). The fallacies of composition and division revisited. Cogency, 1, 1. 23-42.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F., Garssen B., Godden D., Mitchell G. (eds) (2011). Proceedings of the 2010 ISSA Conference. Amsterdam: SICSAT.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Garssen, B. & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and Judgements of Reasonableness \u2013 Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-dialectical Discussion Rules. Dordrecht, Springer.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Grootendorst R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Grootendorst R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication, Fallacies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Grootendorst R. (1995). The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Fallacies. In Hansen H. V. & Pinto R. C. (eds) (1995). Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State UP. www.ditext.com\/eemeren\/ pd.html (09-20-2013).<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Grootendorst R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge UP.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R., Blair J. A. & Willard, C. A. (eds.) (1987). Proceedings of the Conference on argumentation (1986). Dordrecht: Foris.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R., Blair J. A. & Willard C. A. (eds.) (1991). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation. Amsterdam: SICSAT.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R., Blair J. A. & Willard C. A. (eds.) (1995). Proceedings of the Third ISSA conference on argumentation (1994). Amsterdam: SICSAT.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R., Blair J. A. & Willard, C. A. (eds.) (1999). Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SICSAT.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R., Snoeck Henkemans A. F., Blair J. A., Johnson R.<\/p>\n

H., Krabbe E. C. W., Plantin Chr., Walton D. N., Willard C. A., Woods J. &<\/p>\n

Zarefsky D. (1996). Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory, A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Houtlosser P. (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric. Dordrecht: Kluwer.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Houtlosser P. (2003). More About Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Maneuvering: The Case of Tu Quoque. \u201cInformal Logic @ 25\u201d Conference, OSSA, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario. CDRom.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H., Houtlosser P. & Snoeck Henkemans A. F. (2007). Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Amsterdam: Springer.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Houtlosser P. (eds) (2000). The Relation Between Rhetoric and Dialectic. Argumentation, 14-3.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Houtlosser P. (eds) (2006). Perspectives on Strategic Maneuvering. Argumentation 20, 4.<\/p>\n

van Eemeren F. H. & Kruiger T. (1987). Identifying Argumentation Schemes. In van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R., Blair J. A. & Willard, C. A. (eds.) (1987). 271-291.<\/p>\n

Eggs E. (1994). Grammaire du Discours Argumentatif. Paris: Kim\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Eggs E. (2000). Logos, ethos, pathos – L\u2019actualit\u00e9 de la rh\u00e9torique des passions chez Aristote. In Plantin Chr., Doury M. Traverso V. (eds). (2000). 15-31.<\/p>\n

Ehninger D. & Brockriede W. [1960] = (1983). Toulmin on argument – An interpretation and application. In Golden, J. L., Berquist, G. F. & Coleman, W. E. (1983). 121-130.<\/p>\n

Ekman P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish and T. Power (Eds.) The Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Sussex, U.K.: John Wiley. 45\u201360.<\/p>\n

Ellrodt R. (1980). Histoire et analogie de Saint Augustin \u00e0 Milton. In Lichnerowicz A., Perroux F. & Gadoffre G. (eds) (1980). 39-53.<\/p>\n

Ellul J. [1961] = (1999). Histoire des Institutions I. L\u2019Antiquit\u00e9. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

Empson W. (1951). The Structure of Complex Words. London: Chatto and Windus.<\/p>\n

EOD = English Oxford Dictionary. https:\/\/en.oxforddictionaries.com<\/p>\n

Erasmus D., [1524] = (no date) On the Freedom of the Will. Trans. by E. G. Rupp. www.sjsu.edu\/people\/james.lindahl\/courses\/Hum1B\/s3\/Erasmus-and-Luther-on-Free-Will-and-Salvation.pdf. (17-05-23) (no pag.)<\/p>\n

Erduran S. & Jim\u00e9nez-Aleixandre M. P. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education. Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Dordrecht: Springer.<\/p>\n

Feigl H. & Sellars W. (1949). Readings in philosophical analysis. Atascadero, CAL:Ridgeview.<\/p>\n

Feteris E. T. (1999). Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation – A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions. Dordrecht, Kluwer.<\/p>\n

FF = The Fallacy Files, http:\/\/www.fallacyfiles.org.<\/p>\n

Finocchiaro M. A. (1994). The positive versus the negative evaluation of arguments. In Johnson R. H. & Blair J. A. (eds) (1994). 21-35.<\/p>\n

Finocchiaro M. A. (1999). A critique of the dialectical approach – Part II. In Eemeren, FH. van, Grootendorst, R., Blair, J. A. & Willard, C. A. (eds.) (1999). 195-199.<\/p>\n

Finocchiaro M. A. (2013). Meta-Argumentation – An Approach to Logic and Argumentation. Theory. London: College Publications.<\/p>\n

Fisher D. H. (1970). Historians\u2019 Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. New York:<\/p>\n

Harper & Row<\/p>\n

Fogelin R. (1985). The Logic of deep disagreement. Informal Logic 7, 1. 3-11.<\/p>\n

Fogelin R. J. & Duggan T. J. (1987). Fallacies. Argumentation 1, 3. 255-262.<\/p>\n

Fontanier P. [1827], [1831] = (1977). Les Figures du Discours: Trait\u00e9 G\u00e9n\u00e9ral des Figures du<\/p>\n

Discours Autres Que les Tropes (1827) \u2014 Manuel Classique Pour l\u2019\u00c9tude des Tropes ou<\/p>\n

El\u00e9mens de la Science des Mots (1831). Introd. by G. Genette. Paris: Flammarion.<\/p>\n

Foucault M. (1969). L\u2019arch\u00e9ologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.<\/p>\n

Foucault M. (1971). L\u2019ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.<\/p>\n

Foviaux J. (1986). De l\u2019empire romain \u00e0 la f\u00e9odalit\u00e9. Droit et Institutions. Paris: Economica.<\/p>\n

Fraisse P. & Piaget J. (1968). Les \u00e9motions. In P. Fraisse & J. Piaget (eds) (1968). Trait\u00e9<\/p>\n

de psychologie exp\u00e9rimentale V: Motivation, \u00e9motion et personnalit\u00e9. Paris: PUF. 86-<\/p>\n

155.<\/p>\n

Frank R. H. (1988). Passions within reason. The strategic role of the emotions. New York: Nor-<\/p>\n

ton.<\/p>\n

Frankena W. K. (1967). Value and valuation. In Edwards P. (ed) (1967). The Encyclopedia<\/p>\n

of Philosophy. New York: MacMillan.<\/p>\n

Frege G. [1879] = (1952). Begriffschrift. A Formula Language, Modeled upon that of Arithmetic,<\/p>\n

for Pure Thought. In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Ox-<\/p>\n

ford: Blackwell. 1-20.<\/p>\n

Freud S. [1900] = (1955). The Interpretation of Dreams. Trans. and ed. by J. Strachey. New<\/p>\n

York, Basic Books, 2010.<\/p>\n

Freud S. [1923] = (1961). The Ego and the Id. In J. Strachey, The Standard Edition of the<\/p>\n

Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Volume XIX (1923-1925): The Ego<\/p>\n

and the Id and Other Works. London: Hogarth Press & the Institute of Psycho-<\/p>\n

analysis. 1-66.<\/p>\n

Freud S. [1925] = (1961). Negation. In J. Strachey The Standard Edition of the Complete<\/p>\n

605References<\/p>\n

Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Volume XIX (1923-1925): The Ego and the<\/p>\n

Id and Other Works. London: Hogarth Press & the Institute of Psycho-analysis.<\/p>\n

233-240.<\/p>\n

Fumaroli M. (1980). L\u2019\u00e2ge de l\u2019\u00e9loquence. Rh\u00e9torique et \u2018res literaria\u2019 de la Renaissance au seuil<\/p>\n

de l\u2019\u00e9poque classique. Paris: Droz.<\/p>\n

Fumaroli (ed.) (1999). Histoire de la Rh\u00e9torique dans l\u2019Europe Moderne 1450-1950. Paris:<\/p>\n

PUF.<\/p>\n

Gabbay D. M. & Woods J. (2003). Agenda Relevance: An Essay in Formal Pragmatics. Am-<\/p>\n

sterdam: North-Holland, 2003.<\/p>\n

Gabbay D. M. & Woods J. (2005). The Reach of Abduction: Insight and Trial. Amsterdam:<\/p>\n

North-Holland.<\/p>\n

Gadamer H.-G. [1967] = (1988). Rhetoric, hermeneutics, and the critique of ideology.<\/p>\n

In Mueller-Vollmer, K. (ed.) (1988). 256-292.<\/p>\n

Gadoffre G. (1980). Introduction. In Lichnerowicz A., Perroux F. & Gadoffre G. (eds)<\/p>\n

(1980). 7-10.<\/p>\n

Gadoffre G., Walker P. & Tripet A. (1980). Les hommes de la renaissance et l\u2019analogie.<\/p>\n

In Lichnerowicz A., Perroux F. & Gadoffre G. (eds) (1980). 47-53.<\/p>\n

Gaffiot F. (1934). Dictionnaire Illustr\u00e9 Latin-Fran\u00e7ais. Paris: Hachette.<\/p>\n

Gardet L. & Anawati M. M. [1967] = (1986). Mystique Musulmane. Aspects et Tendances,<\/p>\n

Exp\u00e9riences et Techniques. Paris: Vrin.<\/p>\n

Gardet L., Anawati M. M. [1948] = (1981). Introduction \u00e0 la Philosophie Musulmane. Essai de<\/p>\n

Th\u00e9ologie Compar\u00e9e. Paris: Vrin.<\/p>\n

Garfinkel H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.<\/p>\n

Gautier M. (2004). Dialectique. In Dictionnaire des Notions. Paris: Encyclop\u00e6dia Univer-<\/p>\n

salis. 268-270<\/p>\n

Genette G. (1970). La Rh\u00e9torique restreinte. Communications 16. 158-171.<\/p>\n

Gil F. (1988). Preuves. Paris: Aubier.<\/p>\n

Gilman S. L., Blair C. & Parent D. J. (1989). Friedrich Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language.<\/p>\n

Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

Gilson \u00c9. see Descartes R. [1637]\n

Ginzburg C. (1999). History, Rhetoric and Proof. Hannovre & London: University Press of<\/p>\n

New England.<\/p>\n

Goddu G. G. 2007). Against making the linked-convergent distinction. In van Eemeren<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. H., Blair J. A., Willard C. A., Garssen B. (eds.) (2007). 465-469.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Goffman E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.<\/p>\n

    Goffman E. [1956] = (1987). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.<\/p>\n

    Golden J. L., Berquist G. F. & Coleman W. E. (1983). The Rhetoric of Western Thought.<\/p>\n

    3rd ed. Dubuque: Kendall & Hunt.<\/p>\n

    Golder C. (1996). Le D\u00e9veloppement des Discours Argumentatifs. Lausanne: Delachaux &<\/p>\n

    Niestl\u00e9.<\/p>\n

    Google = Google Dictionary<\/p>\n

    606References<\/p>\n

    Govier T. (1987). Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Dordrecht: Foris.<\/p>\n

    Grice H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole P. Morgan J. L. (eds) (1975). Syntax<\/p>\n

    and Semantics – Vol.3 Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41-58<\/p>\n

    Grimshaw A. D. (ed.) (1990). Conflict talk – Sociolinguistic Investigations on Arguments in<\/p>\n

    Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n

    Grize J.-B. (1972). Logique Moderne. 1: Logique des Propositions et des Pr\u00e9dicats. Paris: Mouton<\/p>\n

    & Gauthier-Villars.<\/p>\n

    Grize J.-B. (1982). De la Logique \u00e0 l’Argumentation. Pref by G. Busino. Geneva: Droz.<\/p>\n

    Grize J.-B. (1990). Logique et Langage. Gap: Ophrys.<\/p>\n

    Grize J.-B. (1993). Comment fait-on pour dire \u2018P donc Q\u2019 ? In G. Maurand (ed.) Le<\/p>\n

    raisonnement. Toulouse: cals. 3-12.<\/p>\n

    Grize J.-B. (1987). Pens\u00e9e Naturelle, Logique et Langage – Hommage \u00e0 Jean-Blaise Grize. Neu-<\/p>\n

    ch\u00e2tel, Universit\u00e9 de Neuch\u00e2tel Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto – Revue europ\u00e9enne des sciences<\/p>\n

    sociales 77, XXV.<\/p>\n

    Grize J.-B. (ed.) (1971). Logique de l\u2019Argumentation et Discours Argumentatifs. Travaux du<\/p>\n

    CdRS 7, Centre de Recherches s\u00e9miologiques. Neuch\u00e2tel: Universit\u00e9 de Neu-<\/p>\n

    ch\u00e2tel.<\/p>\n

    Grize J.-B. (ed.) (1974). Recherches sur le Discours et l\u2019Argumentation. Geneva: Droz.<\/p>\n

    Grize, J.-B. (1996). Logique et Communication. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

    Groupe Mu (1970) = Dubois J., Edeline F., Klinkenberg J.-M, Minguet P., Pire F., &<\/p>\n

    Trinon H. (1970). Rh\u00e9torique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale. Paris: Larousse.<\/p>\n

    Hamblin C. L. (1970). Fallacies. Londres, Methuen.<\/p>\n

    Han-Fei-tse, Tao = (1999) Han-Fei-tse ou Le Tao du Prince. Introd. and trans. by J. Levi.<\/p>\n

    Paris: Le Seuil.<\/p>\n

    Hedge L. (1838). Elements of Logick, or a Summary of the General Principles and Different modes<\/p>\n

    of Reasoning. Boston: Hilliar.<\/p>\n

    Heritage J. (1987). Interactional accountability. A conversation analytic perspective. In<\/p>\n

    Conein, B., de Fornel M., Qu\u00e9r\u00e9 L. (eds) 1987. 23-49.<\/p>\n

    Hermogenes (AR) = (1997). L\u2019art Rh\u00e9torique. Trad., introd. and notes by M. Patillon.<\/p>\n

    Pref. by P. Laurens. Lausanne: L\u2019\u00c2ge d\u2019Homme.<\/p>\n

    Hermogenes (OI) = (1995). Hermogenes On Issues. Trans. by M. Heath. Oxford: Clar-<\/p>\n

    endon Press.<\/p>\n

    Hesse M. (1967). Models and analogy in science. In Edwards P. (ed.) (1967). Vol. 5.<\/p>\n

    354-359.<\/p>\n

    Hintikka J. (1979). Information-seeking dialogues: A Model. Erkenntnis 38. 355-368.<\/p>\n

    Hintikka J. (1987). The fallacy of fallacies. Argumentation 1, 3. 211-238.<\/p>\n

    Hirschman A. O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge,<\/p>\n

    MA & London: CUP.<\/p>\n

    Hoaglund J. (2003). Using argument types. In van Eemeren F. H., Blair J. A., Willard C.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. & Snoeck-Henkemans A. F. (eds) (2003). 491-495.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Hoaglund J. (2007). Informal Logic and Pragma-Dialectics. In van Eemeren F. H., Blair<\/p>\n

      607References<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. A., Willard C. A. & Garssen B. (eds.) (2007). 621-624.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        IEP = Fieser J. & Dowden B., s.d. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu\/ (09-<\/p>\n

        20-2013)<\/p>\n

        Jacobs L. & Derovan D. (2007). Hermeneutics. In Skolnik & Berenbaum (eds) (2007)<\/p>\n

        Encyclopedia Judaica. 2nd ed. vol. 9. USA: MacMillan & Jerusalem: Keter. 25-29.<\/p>\n

        Jacobs S. & Jackson S. (1982). Conversational argument. A discourse analytic approach.<\/p>\n

        In J. R. Cox J. R., Willard C. A. (eds) (1982). 205-237.<\/p>\n

        Jakobson R. [1960] = (1987). Linguistics and poetics. In Pomorska K. & Rudt S. (eds)<\/p>\n

        (1987). Language in Literature \u2013 Roman Jakobson. Cambridge, MA: Belknap & Har-<\/p>\n

        vard UP. 62-94.<\/p>\n

        Jakobson R. (1971). A joint conference of anthropologists and linguists. In Selected<\/p>\n

        Writings II. Words and Language. The Hague, Paris: Mouton 1971. 554-567.<\/p>\n

        Johnson R. H. (1996). The Rise of Informal Logic. Newport News VA: Vale Press.<\/p>\n

        Johnson R. H. & Blair J. A. (eds) (1994). New Essays in Informal Logic. Windsor, Informal<\/p>\n

        Logic.<\/p>\n

        Joule R. V. & Beauvois J. L. (1987). Petit Trait\u00e9 de Manipulation \u00e0 l\u2019Usage des Honn\u00eates Gens.<\/p>\n

        Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.<\/p>\n

        Kahane H. (1971). Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life. Bel-<\/p>\n

        mont CA: Wadsworth.<\/p>\n

        Kalinowski G. (1965). Introduction \u00e0 la Logique Juridique \u2013 \u00c9l\u00e9ments de S\u00e9miotique Juridique,<\/p>\n

        Logique des Normes et Logique Juridique. Paris: Librairie G\u00e9n\u00e9rale de Droit et de Ju-<\/p>\n

        risprudence.<\/p>\n

        Kallmeyer W. (ed.) (1996). Gespr\u00e4chsrhetorik \u2013 Rhetorisches Verfahren im Gespr\u00e4chsprocess.<\/p>\n

        T\u00fcbingen: Gunter Narr.<\/p>\n

        Kant I. [1781] = (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. by P. Guyer & A. W.<\/p>\n

        Wood. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n

        Kelsen H., [1934] = (1967). Pure Theory of Law. Trans. by M. Knight. Berkeley, CA:<\/p>\n

        University of California Press.<\/p>\n

        Kennedy G. A., [1980] = (1999). Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition<\/p>\n

        from Ancient to Modern Times. 2nd revised and enlarged edition. Chapel Hill, NC:<\/p>\n

        University of North Carolina Press.<\/p>\n

        Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. (1980). L\u2019\u00c9nonciation. De la Subjectivit\u00e9 dans le Langage. Paris: Ar-<\/p>\n

        mand Colin.<\/p>\n

        Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. (1990 \u2013 1994). Les Interactions Verbales. T. 1 (1990); T. 2 (1992);<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. 3 (1994). Paris: Armand Colin.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. (2000). L\u2019analyse des interactions verbales. La notion de \u2018n\u00e9go-<\/p>\n

          ciation conversationnelle\u2019 – D\u00e9fense et illustration. Lalies 20. 63-141.<\/p>\n

          Khall\u00e2f \u2018A. al-W. [1942] = (1997). Les Fondements du Droit Musulman. Trans. by Cl. Dab-<\/p>\n

          bak, A. Godin & M. Labidi Maiza. Pref. by A. Turki. Paris: Al Qalam.<\/p>\n

          Kienpointner M. (1987). Towards a typology of argumentative schemes. In van Eeme-<\/p>\n

          ren F. H., Grootendorst R., Blair J. A. & Willard C. A. (eds.) (1987). 275-288.<\/p>\n

          Kienpointner M. (1992). Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern.<\/p>\n

          608References<\/p>\n

          Stuttgart-Bad Cannstadt: Fromman-Holzboog.<\/p>\n

          Kienpointner M. (2003). Nouvelle Rh\u00e9torique \/ Neue Rhetorik. In G. Ueding (Hg.)<\/p>\n

          Historisches W\u00f6rterbuch der Rhetorik, Bd 6. T\u00fcbingen: Niemeyer. 561-587.<\/p>\n

          Kleene S. C. [1967] = Mathematical Logic. New York: Wiley<\/p>\n

          https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/KleeneMathematicalLogic (09-26-2017)<\/p>\n

          Kleiber G. 1990). La S\u00e9mantique du Prototype – Cat\u00e9gorie et Sens Lexical. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

          Klinkenberg J.-M. (1990). Rh\u00e9torique de l\u2019argumentation et rh\u00e9torique des figures. In<\/p>\n

          Meyer M. & Lempereur, A. (eds) (1990). 115-137.<\/p>\n

          Klinkenberg J.-M. (2000). L’Argumentation dans la figure. Cahiers de prax\u00e9matique 35.<\/p>\n

          http:\/\/journals.openedition.org\/praxematique\/2898 (09-26-2016)<\/p>\n

          Klinkenberg J.-M. (2001). Ret\u00f3rica de la argumentaci\u00f3n y ret\u00f3rica de las figuras: \u00bfher-<\/p>\n

          manas o enemigas ? Tonos digital, 1. um.es\/tonosdigital\/znum1\/estudios\/Klinkenberg.htm.<\/p>\n

          (09-20-2017)<\/p>\n

          Kneale W. & Kneale M. [1962] = (1984). The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon<\/p>\n

          Press.<\/p>\n

          Koons R. (2005). Defeasible reasoning. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. E. N. Zalta<\/p>\n

          (ed.). http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/spr2005\/entries\/reasoning-defeasible\/<\/p>\n

          Kotarbinski T. [1964] = (1971). Le\u00e7ons sur l\u2019Histoire de la Logique. Trans. by A. Posner.<\/p>\n

          Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.<\/p>\n

          Krabbe E. C. W. (1998). Who is afraid of figures of speech ? Argumentation 12, 2. 281-<\/p>\n

          294<\/p>\n

          Lakoff G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University<\/p>\n

          Press.<\/p>\n

          Laplanche J. & Pontalis, J.-B. (1967). Dictionnaire de Psychanalyse. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

          Lausberg H., [1960] = (1973). Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary<\/p>\n

          Study . Translated from German by M. T. Bliss, A. Jansen & D. E. Orton. Edit-<\/p>\n

            \n
          1. D. E. Orton & R. D. Anderson. Foreword G. A. Kennedy. Leiden: E.J. Brill.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Lausberg H., [1963] = (1971). Elemente der literarischen Rhetorik. Munich: Max Hueber.<\/p>\n

            Le Bon G. [1895] = (1960). The Crowd. A Study of Popular Mind. New York: Macmillan.<\/p>\n

            Le Brun J. (2011). Review of Houdard S., Les Invasions Mystiques. In Revue de l\u2019Histoire des<\/p>\n

            Religions, 1. 124-128. http:\/\/rhr.revues.org\/7738 (09-20-2013).<\/p>\n

            Leibniz G. W. [1765] = (1896). New Essays Concerning Human Understanding. Trans. by A.<\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Langley. London: Macmillan.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Lempereur A. (1990). Les restrictions des deux n\u00e9o-rh\u00e9toriques. In Meyer M. & Lem-<\/p>\n

              pereur A. (eds) (1990). 139-158.<\/p>\n

              L\u00e9vinas E. [1981] = (1987). Langage quotidien et rh\u00e9torique sans \u00e9loquence. In Hors<\/p>\n

              sujet. Fata Morgana. 201-211.<\/p>\n

              L\u00e9vy C. & Pernot L. (1997). Dire l\u2019\u00c9vidence. Philosophie et Rh\u00e9torique Antiques. Paris:<\/p>\n

              L\u2019Harmattan.<\/p>\n

              Lichnerowicz A., Perroux F. & Gadoffre G. (eds) (1980). Analogie et Connaissance. T. 1,<\/p>\n

              Aspects historiques. T. II, De la Po\u00e9sie \u00e0 la Science. Paris: Maloine.<\/p>\n

              Littr\u00e9 \u00c9. [1863] = (1972) Dictionnaire de la Langue Fran\u00e7aise. Paris: Hachette.<\/p>\n

              609References<\/p>\n

              http:\/\/www.littre.org\/ (09-20-2013).<\/p>\n

              Lloyd G. E. R. (1990). Demystifyng Mentalities. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University<\/p>\n

              Press.<\/p>\n

              Lo Cascio V. (2009). Persuadere e Convincere Oggi. Nuovo Manuale dell\u2019Argomentazione. Acqui<\/p>\n

              Terme: Academia Press.<\/p>\n

              Locke J. [1690] = (1959). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding<\/em>. Collected and anno-<\/strong><\/p>\n

              tated by A. C. Fraser. New York: Dover.<\/strong><\/p>\n

              Lorenzo-Basson M.-C. (2004). La Vente \u00e0 Domicile. Strat\u00e9gies Discursives en Interaction. PhD, Lyon 2 University, under the supervision of C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni.<\/p>\n

              Louis P. (1990). Vie d\u2019Aristote. Paris: Hermann.<\/p>\n

              Mackenzie J. (1988). Distinguo. The response to equivocation. Argumentation 2-4. 465-<\/p>\n

              482.<\/p>\n

              Mackie J. L. (1967). Fallacies. In Edwards P. (ed.) The Encylopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 3.<\/p>\n

              169-179.<\/p>\n

              Maingueneau D. (1976). Initiation aux M\u00e9thodes de l\u2019Analyse du Discours. Paris: Hachette.<\/p>\n

              Maingueneau D. (1990). L\u2019Analyse du Discours. Paris: Hachette.<\/p>\n

              Maingueneau D. (1999). Ethos, sc\u00e9nographie, incorporation. In Amossy R. (ed.) (1999).<\/p>\n

              75-102.<\/p>\n

              Man P. de (1978). The epistemology of metaphor. In Sacks S. (ed.) On Metaphor. 11-28.<\/p>\n

              Maritain J. [1923] = (1946). An Introduction to Logic. Trans. by I. Choquette. London:<\/p>\n

              Scheed & Ward.<\/p>\n

              Mayans y Siscar G. (1786). Rhetorica. Valencia: Josef y Thomas de Orga (2e ed.)<\/p>\n

              McAdon B. (2003). Probabilities, necessary signs, idia and topoi. The confusing discus-<\/p>\n

              sion of material for enthymemes in the Rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 36, 3. 223-<\/p>\n

              248.<\/p>\n

              McAdon B. (2004). Two irreconcilable conceptions of rhetorical proof in Aristotle\u2019s<\/p>\n

              Rhetoric. Rhetorica, 22, 4. 307-325<\/p>\n

              McEvoy S. (1995). L\u2019invention D\u00e9fensive \u2014 Po\u00e9tique, Linguistique, Droit. Paris: M\u00e9taili\u00e9.<\/p>\n

              Meyer M. (ed.) (1986). De la M\u00e9taphysique \u00e0 la Rh\u00e9torique. Brussels: \u00c9ditions de<\/p>\n

              l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Bruxelles.<\/p>\n

              Meyer M. & Lempereur A. (eds) 1990). Figures et Conflits Rh\u00e9toriques. Brussels: \u00c9ditions<\/p>\n

              de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Bruxelles.<\/p>\n

              Milgram S. (1974). Obedience to authority. An Experimental View. London: Tavistock Publi-<\/p>\n

              cations. https:\/\/archive.org\/stream\/ObedienceToAuthority_368\/milgram<\/p>\n

              Mill J. S. [1843] = (2017). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: John W.<\/p>\n

              Parker. http:\/\/www.earlymoderntexts.com\/assets\/pdfs\/mill1843book1.pdf<\/p>\n

              Mill J. S. [1859] = (1987). On Liberty. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.<\/p>\n

              Moeschler J. & Reboul A. (1994). Dictionnaire Encyclop\u00e9dique de Pragmatique. Paris: Le<\/p>\n

              Seuil.<\/p>\n

              Moeschler J. (1985). Argumentation et Conversation. \u00c9l\u00e9ments pour une Analyse Pragmatique du<\/p>\n

              Discours. Paris: Hatier.<\/p>\n

              610References<\/p>\n

              Molini\u00e9 G. (1992). Dictionnaire de Rh\u00e9torique. Paris: Librairie G\u00e9n\u00e9rale Fran\u00e7aise.<\/p>\n

              Molino J. (1979) M\u00e9taphores, mod\u00e8les et analogies dans les sciences. Langages, 54. 83-<\/p>\n

              102.<\/p>\n

              Moore G. E., [1903] = (1986). Principia Ethica. Cambridge, MA: CUP.<\/p>\n

              Mortureux M.-F. (1993). Paradigmes d\u00e9signationnels. Semen 8, Besan\u00e7on: Presses de<\/p>\n

              l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Franche-Comt\u00e9. 121-142. http:\/\/journals.openedition.org\/semen\/4132<\/p>\n

              Mueller-Vollmer K. (1988). The Hermeneutics Reader. New York: Continuum.<\/p>\n

              MW = Merriam-Webster Dictionary. www.merriam-webster.com<\/p>\n

              Nadeau R. (1958). Hermogenes on \u2018stock issues\u2019 in deliberative speaking. Speech Mono-<\/p>\n

              graphs, 25. 59-66.<\/p>\n

              Nadeau R. (1964). Hermogenes\u2019 On Stases. A translation with an introduction and notes.<\/p>\n

              Speech Monographs, 31. 361-424.<\/p>\n

              Newman J. H., [1870] = (2010). An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent. London: Burns,<\/p>\n

              Oates. Quoted after http:\/\/onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu\/webbin\/gutbook\/lookup?num=34022<\/p>\n

              (19-07-2017)<\/p>\n

              Nicolas L. (2007). La Force de la Doxa. Rh\u00e9torique de la D\u00e9cision et de la D\u00e9lib\u00e9ration. Paris:<\/p>\n

              L\u2019Harmattan.<\/p>\n

              Nietzsche F. see Gilman & al.<\/p>\n

              Nonnon E. (1996) Activit\u00e9s argumentatives et \u00e9laboration de connaissances nouvelles.<\/p>\n

              Langue Fran\u00e7aise 112. 67-87.<\/p>\n

              O\u2019Keefe B. J., [1977] = (1982). Two concepts of argument and arguing. In Cox, J. R.,<\/p>\n

                \n
              1. A., Willard (eds) (1982). 3-23.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                OD = Oxford Dictionary https:\/\/en.oxforddictionaries.com (07-09-2017)<\/p>\n

                OED = Online Etymology Dictionary. http:\/\/www.etymonline.com\/ (07-09-2017)<\/p>\n

                Olbrechts-Tyteca L. (1974). Le Comique du Discours. Brussels: \u00c9ditions de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de<\/p>\n

                Bruxelles.<\/p>\n

                Ong W. J. (1958). Ramus. Method and the Decay of Dialogue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard<\/p>\n

                University Press.<\/p>\n

                Ortony A. (ed.) (1979). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University<\/p>\n

                Press.<\/p>\n

                Packard V. [1957] = (2007). The Hidden Persuaders. New York: Ig Publishing.<\/p>\n

                Parent X. & Livet P. (2002). Argumentation, r\u00e9vision et conditionnels. In P. Livet (ed.)<\/p>\n

                R\u00e9vision des Croyances. Paris: Herm\u00e8s Sciences Publication. 229-258.<\/p>\n

                Pascal B. (Geom.) = (1859). Of the geometrical spirit. In The Thoughts, Letters and Opus-<\/p>\n

                cules of Blaise Pascal. Trans. by O. W. Wight. New York: Derby & Jackson.<\/p>\n

                Pascal B. (Mem.) = (1999). Memorial. Trans. by E. T. Knuth & O. Joseph.<\/p>\n

                http:\/\/www.users.csbsju.edu\/~eknuth\/pascal.html (07-09-2017).<\/p>\n

                Pascal B. (Thoughts) = (1901). The Thoughts of Blaise Pascal. Trans. by C. Kegan Paul.<\/p>\n

                London: Georges Bell.<\/p>\n

                Patillon M. (1988). La Th\u00e9orie du Discours d\u2019Hermog\u00e8ne le Rh\u00e9teur. Essai sur la Structure de la<\/p>\n

                Rh\u00e9torique Ancienne. Paris: Les Belles-Lettres.<\/p>\n

                611References<\/p>\n

                Patillon M. (1990). El\u00e9ments de Rh\u00e9torique Classique. Paris: Nathan.<\/p>\n

                Peirce C. S. [1958]. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 7, Book II: Scientific Meth-<\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Ed. by A. W. Burke. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Pellegrin P. (1997). Glossaire. In Sextus Empiricus, Esquisses Pyrrhoniennes. Paris: Le<\/p>\n

                  Seuil. 527-556.<\/p>\n

                  Perelman Ch. (1952). Acte et personne dans l\u2019argumentation. In Perelman Ch. & Ol-<\/p>\n

                  brechts-Tyteca L. (1952). 49-84.<\/p>\n

                  Perelman Ch. (1961). Jugements de valeur, justification et argumentation. Revue Interna-<\/p>\n

                  tionale de Philosophie 58, 4. 327-335.<\/p>\n

                  Perelman Ch. [1963] = (1972). Justice et Raison. Brussels: \u00c9ditions de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 de<\/p>\n

                  Bruxelles.<\/p>\n

                  Perelman Ch. (1977). L\u2019empire rh\u00e9torique. Rh\u00e9torique et Argumentation. Paris: Vrin.<\/p>\n

                  Perelman Ch. (1979). Logique juridique \u2013 Nouvelle rh\u00e9torique. Paris: Dalloz.<\/p>\n

                  Perelman Ch. (1980). Logic and rhetoric. In Agazzi E. (ed.) (1980). 457-464.<\/p>\n

                  Perelman Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca L. [1950] = (1952). Logique et rRh\u00e9torique. In Pe-<\/p>\n

                  relman Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca L. (1952). 1-43.<\/p>\n

                  Perelman Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca L. (1952). Rh\u00e9torique et Philosophie. Pour une Th\u00e9orie de<\/p>\n

                  l\u2019Argumentation en Philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.<\/p>\n

                  Perelman Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca L. [1958] = (1969). The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on<\/p>\n

                  Argumentation. Trans. by J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver. Notre Dame IN: Universi-<\/p>\n

                  ty of Notre Dame Press.<\/p>\n

                  Piaget J. [1924] = (1967). Le Jugement et le Raisonnement chez l\u2019Enfant. Neuch\u00e2tel: Dela-<\/p>\n

                  chaux & Niestl\u00e9.<\/p>\n

                  Plantin Chr. (1990). Essais sur l\u2019argumentation. Paris: Kim\u00e9.<\/p>\n

                  Plantin Chr. (ed.) (1993). Lieux Communs, Topoi, St\u00e9r\u00e9otypes, Clich\u00e9s. Paris: Kim\u00e9.<\/p>\n

                  Plantin Chr. (1995). L\u2019Argumentation. Paris: Le Seuil.<\/p>\n

                  Plantin Chr., Doury M., Traverso V. (eds) (2000). Les \u00e9motions dans les interactions. Lyon,<\/p>\n

                  PUL.<\/p>\n

                  Plantin Chr. (2005). L\u2019Argumentation: Histoire, Th\u00e9ories, Perspectives. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

                  Plantin Chr. (2009). A place for figures of speech in argumentation theory. Argumenta-<\/p>\n

                  tion 23, 3. 325-337.<\/p>\n

                  Plantin Chr. (2011). Les instruments de structuration des s\u00e9quences argumentatives.<\/p>\n

                  Verbum 32, 1. 31-51.<\/p>\n

                  Plantin, Chr. 2015, Emotion and Affect. In Tracy, Karen, Ilie, Cornelia & Sandel, Todd<\/p>\n

                  (eds.) (2015). The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Boston:<\/p>\n

                  John Wiley & Sons.<\/p>\n

                  Plato CW = (1997) Complete Works. Ed. with Introd. and Notes by J. M. Cooper. Indi-<\/p>\n

                  anapolis& Cambridge, MA: Hackett.<\/p>\n

                  Plato. Euthydemus. Trans. by R. Kent Sprague. In Plato, CW, 708-745<\/p>\n

                  Plato. Gorgias. Trans. by D. J. Zeyl. In Plato, CW, 791-869<\/p>\n

                  Plato. Phaedrus. Trans. by A. Nehamas and P. Woodruff. In Plato, CW, 506-556.<\/p>\n

                  612References<\/p>\n

                  Pomerantz A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. Some features of<\/p>\n

                  preferred \/ dispreferred turn-shapes. In Atkinson J.-M. & Heritage J. (eds)<\/p>\n

                  (1984). 79-112.<\/p>\n

                  Popper K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations – The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London:<\/p>\n

                  Routledge & Kegan Paul.<\/p>\n

                  Porphyry Isa. = (1975) Porphyry the Ph\u0153nician. Isagoge. Trans., introd. and notes by E.<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Warren. Toronto: The Pontifical Institute of Medi\u00e6val Studies.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    PR = Rey-Debove J., Rey A., Chantreau S. & Drivaud M.-H. (1967). Le Nouveau Petit<\/p>\n

                    Robert: Dictionnaire alphab\u00e9tique et analogique de la langue fran\u00e7aise. Paris: Le Robert.<\/p>\n

                    Prior A. N. (1967). Traditional logic. In P. Edwards (ed.) (1967), Vol. 5. 34-45.<\/p>\n

                    Quine W. V .O. (1959). Methods of Logic. Revised ed. New York, etc.: Holt, Rinehart &<\/p>\n

                    Winston.<\/p>\n

                    Quine W. V. O. (1966). Logic as a source of syntactical insight. Journal of Symbolic Logic<\/p>\n

                    31, 3. 496-497.<\/p>\n

                    Quine W. V. O. (1980). Elementary Logic. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA. & London,<\/p>\n

                    England: Harvard UP.<\/p>\n

                    Quine W. V. O. & Ullian, J. S. (1982). The Web of Belief. New York: Random House.<\/p>\n

                    Quintilian, IO = (1903). Quintilian’s Institutes of Oratory. Trans. by J. S. Watson. London:<\/p>\n

                    George Bell.<\/p>\n

                    Reboul O. (1986). La figure et l\u2019argument. In Meyer M. (ed.) (1986). 175\u2013187.<\/p>\n

                    Reboul O. (1991). Introduction \u00e0 la Rh\u00e9torique. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

                    R\u00e9canati F. (1979). La Transparence et l\u2019\u00c9nonciation. Paris: Le Seuil.<\/p>\n

                    Reiter R. (1980). A logic for default reasoning. Artificial intelligence 13. 81-131.<\/p>\n

                    Reverso = Reverso Dictionary, German-French. http:\/\/dictionary.reverso.net\/German-french\/<\/p>\n

                    (12-12-2017)<\/p>\n

                    Richards I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n

                    Rim\u00e9 B. & Scherer K. (eds) (1993). Les \u00c9motions. Neuch\u00e2tel: Delachaux et Niestl\u00e9.<\/p>\n

                    Rocheblave-Spenl\u00e9 A.-M. [1962] = (1969) La Notion de R\u00f4le en Psychologie Sociale. Paris:<\/p>\n

                    PUF.<\/p>\n

                    Romilly J. de (1988). Les Grands Sophistes dans l\u2019Ath\u00e8nes de P\u00e9ricl\u00e8s. Paris: de Fallois.<\/p>\n

                    Rorty A. O. (ed.) (1996). Essays on Aristotle\u2019s Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California<\/p>\n

                    Press.<\/p>\n

                    Russell B. [1905] = (1949). On denoting. In Feigl H. & Sellars W. (1949). 103-115.<\/p>\n

                    Ryan E. E. (1984). Aristotle\u2019s Theory of Rhetorical Argumentation. Montr\u00e9al: Bellarmin.<\/p>\n

                    Ryle G. (1932). Systematically misleading expressions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,<\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. 139-170.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Sacks S. (ed.) (1978). On Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n

                      Sallantin J. & Szczeciniarz J. J. (eds.) (1999). Le Concept de Preuve \u00e0 la Lumi\u00e8re de<\/p>\n

                      l\u2019Intelligence Artificielle. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

                      Saussure L. de (2015). The straw Man argument as a pragmatic argumentative winner.<\/p>\n

                      Conference Argumentation and Language, Lausanne, 2015.<\/p>\n

                      613References<\/p>\n

                      Schellens P. J. (1987). Types of argument and the critical reader. In van Eemeren F. H.,<\/p>\n

                      Grootendorst, R., Blair, J. A. & Willard, C. A. (eds.) (1987). Dordrecht: Foris.<\/p>\n

                      3B. 34-41.<\/p>\n

                      Scherer K. R. [1984a] = (1993). Les \u00e9motions. Fonctions et composantes. In Rim\u00e9, B.<\/p>\n

                      Scherer K. (eds) (1993). 97-133.<\/p>\n

                      Scherer K. R. (1984b). On the nature and function of emotion – A Component Process<\/p>\n

                      Approach. In Scherer K. R. & Ekman P. (eds) (1984). 293-317.<\/p>\n

                      Scherer K. R. & Ekman P. (eds) (1984). Approaches to emotion. Hillsdale, NJ: Law-<\/p>\n

                      rence Erlbaum.<\/p>\n

                      Schiappa E. (1993). Arguing about Definitions. Argumentation 7, 4. 403 \u2013 417.<\/p>\n

                      Schiappa E. (2000). Analyzing argumentative discourse from a rhetorical perspective:<\/p>\n

                      defining \u2018person\u2019 and \u2018human life\u2019 in constitutional disputes over abortion. Argumen-<\/p>\n

                      tation 14-3. 315-332.<\/p>\n

                      Schiffrin D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge UP.<\/p>\n

                      Schiffrin D. (1990). The management of a cooperative self in argument. The role of<\/p>\n

                      opinions and stories. In A. Grimshaw (ed.) (1990). 241- 259.<\/p>\n

                      Schmid M. (1980). Bewegung im TV-Studio. In Eine Stadt in Bewegund. Materialen zu den<\/p>\n

                      Z\u00fcrcher Unruhen. Z\u00fcrich: SD Stadt Z\u00fcrich.<\/p>\n

                      Schopenhauer A. [1830] = (2005). The Art of Controversy. Trans. by T. Bailey Saunders<\/p>\n

                      (1896). http:\/\/insomnia.ac\/essays\/the_art_of_controversy\/penn_state_ebook.pdf (10-03-2017)<\/p>\n

                      Sextus Empiricus OP = (1996). Outlines of Pyrronism. Trans. with introd. and com. by B.<\/p>\n

                      Mates. New York & Oxford: Oxford UP.<\/p>\n

                      http:\/\/www.sciacchitano.it\/pensatori%20epistemici\/scettici\/outlines%20of%20pyrronism.pdf (08-<\/p>\n

                      17-2017)<\/p>\n

                      Shelley C. (2002). Analogy counterarguments and the acceptability of analogical hy-<\/p>\n

                      potheses. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53. 477-496.<\/p>\n

                      Shelley C. (2004). Analogy counterarguments. A taxonomy for critical thinking. Argu-<\/p>\n

                      mentation 18, 2. 223-238.<\/p>\n

                      SIL = Summer Institute of Linguistics \u2013 Glossary of Linguistic Terms. http:\/\/www.glossary.sil.org<\/p>\n

                      (12-12-17)<\/p>\n

                      Sitri F. (2003). L\u2019Objet du D\u00e9bat. La Construction des Objets de Discours dans des Situations<\/p>\n

                      Argumentatives Orales. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle.<\/p>\n

                      Snoeck Henkemans A. F. (2003). Indicators of analogy argumentation. In van Eeeme-<\/p>\n

                      ren F., Blair, J. A., Willard, C. A. Snoeck Henkemans A. F. (eds) (2003). 969-<\/p>\n

                      973.<\/p>\n

                      Snoeck Henkemans A. F. (2000) Comments on E. Schiappa \u201cAnalyzing argumentative<\/p>\n

                      discourse from a rhetorical perspective: Defining \u2018Person\u2019 and \u2018Human Life\u2019 in<\/p>\n

                      constitutional disputes over abortion\u201d. Argumentation 14, 3. 333-338<\/p>\n

                      Snoeck Henkemans A. F. (1992). Analysing Complex Argumentation. Amsterdam: SICSAT.<\/p>\n

                      Solmsen F. (1941). The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric. The American Journal of<\/p>\n

                      Philology 62, 2. 169-190.<\/p>\n

                      Sperber D. & Wilson D. (1995). Relevance – Communication and Cognition. Second ed.,<\/p>\n

                      Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell.<\/p>\n

                      614References<\/p>\n

                      Stevenson C. L. [1938] = (1944). Persuasive definitions. In Stevenson, C. L. (1944).<\/p>\n

                      Ethics and language. New Haven & London: Yale UP.<\/p>\n

                      Strauss L. (1953). Persecution and the Art of Writing. Social Research 8, 1-4. 488-503.<\/p>\n

                      Tarello G. (1972). Sur la sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9 du raisonnement juridique. Die Juristische Argumenta-<\/p>\n

                      tion. Archiv f\u00fcr Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 7. Actes du Congr\u00e8s de Bruxelles de<\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. 103-124.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Tarski A. [1935] = (1983). The concept of truth in formalized languages. Trans. by J. H.<\/p>\n

                        Woodger. In Tarski A. (1983). Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. 2nd edition. Ed.<\/p>\n

                        by J. Corcoran. Indianapolis: Hackett. 152-278.<\/p>\n

                        Tesni\u00e8re L. (1959). \u00c9l\u00e9ments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.<\/p>\n

                        tfd = thefreedictionary. http:\/\/www.thefreedictionary.com\/ (12-12-2017)<\/p>\n

                        TLFi = Tr\u00e9sor de la Langue Fran\u00e7aise informatis\u00e9. http:\/\/www.cnrtl.fr. (09-20-2013)<\/p>\n

                        Thomas S. N. (1986). Practical Reasoning in Natural Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pren-<\/p>\n

                        tice Hall.<\/p>\n

                        Thomas Aquinas (ST) = (1947) The Summa Theologica. Trans. by Fathers of the English<\/p>\n

                        Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Bros.<\/p>\n

                        http:\/\/dhspriory.org\/thomas\/summa\/FP\/FP001.html#FPQ1OUTP1<\/p>\n

                        Toulmin S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n

                        Toulmin S. E., Rieke R. & Janik A. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York:<\/p>\n

                        McMillan.<\/p>\n

                        Traverso V. (2000). La Conversation Ordinaire. Paris: Nathan.<\/p>\n

                        Tricot J. [1928] = (1973). Trait\u00e9 de Logique Formelle. Paris: Vrin.<\/p>\n

                        Trottman C. (1999). Th\u00e9ologie et No\u00e9tique au XVIIIe si\u00e8cle. Paris: Vrin.<\/p>\n

                        Turner D. & Campolo C. (2005). Deep disagreement re-examined. Informal Logic 25. 1-<\/p>\n

                        2.<\/p>\n

                        Tutescu M. (2003). L\u2019Argumentation. Introduction \u00e0 l\u2019\u00c9tude du Discours. Bucarest: Editura<\/p>\n

                        Universit\u00e3tii din Bucuresti.<\/p>\n

                        http:\/\/ebooks.unibuc.ro\/lls\/MarianaTutescu-Argumentation\/1.htm. (12-12-2017)<\/p>\n

                        Ueding G. (ed.) (1992-2015). Historisches W\u00f6rterbuch der Rhetorik. T\u00fcbingen: Niemeyer.<\/p>\n

                        Vannier G. (2001). Argumentation et Droit. Introduction \u00e0 la Nouvelle Rh\u00e9torique de Perelman<\/p>\n

                        Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

                        Vax L. (1982). Lexique Logique. Paris: PUF.<\/p>\n

                        Vega Re\u00f1on L. & Olmos G\u00f3mez P. (2011). Compendio de L\u00f3gica – Argumentaci\u00f3n y Ret\u00f3rica<\/p>\n

                        Madrid: Trotta.<\/p>\n

                        Vidal G. R. (2000). La Ret\u00f3rica de Antifonte. M\u00e9xico: UNAM.<\/p>\n

                        Vignaux G. (1976). L\u2019Argumentation. Essai d\u2019une Logique Discursive. Geneva: Droz.<\/p>\n

                        Vignaux G. (1981). \u00c9noncer, argumenter. Op\u00e9rations du discours, logiques du discours.<\/p>\n

                        In Bouacha A. & Portine H. (eds) Argumentation et \u00c9nonciation. Langue Fran\u00e7aise<\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. 91-116.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Vignaux G. (1999). L\u2019Argumentation. Du Discours \u00e0 la Pens\u00e9e. Paris: Hatier.<\/p>\n

                          Vion R. (1992). La Communication Verbale. Paris: Hachette.<\/p>\n

                          615References<\/p>\n

                          Walton D. N. (1992). The Place of Emotion in Argument. University Park, PA: The Penn-<\/p>\n

                          sylvania State University Press.<\/p>\n

                          Walton D. N. (1996). Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. Toronto: University of<\/p>\n

                          Toronto Press.<\/p>\n

                          Walton D. N. (1997). Appeal to Pity – Argumentum ad Misericordiam. Albany: State<\/p>\n

                          University of New York Press.<\/p>\n

                          Walton D. N. (1999). Francis Bacon. Human bias and the four idols. Argumentation 13,<\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. 385\u2013389.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Walton D. N. (2004). Abductive Reasoning. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.<\/p>\n

                            Walton D. N. (2005). Deceptive arguments containing persuasive language and persua-<\/p>\n

                            sive definitions. Argumentation 19, 2. 159-186.<\/p>\n

                            Walton D., Reed C. & Macagno F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge, MA:<\/p>\n

                            Cambridge University Press.<\/p>\n

                            WCD = Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language. Second College Edition. Cleveland &<\/p>\n

                            New York: William Collins & World Publishing CO.<\/p>\n

                            Weaver R. (1953). Abraham Lincoln and the argument from definition. In The Ethics of<\/p>\n

                            Rhetoric. South Bend, IN: Gateway. 85-114.<\/p>\n

                            Weber M. [1922] = (1978) Economy and Society \u2013 An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Ed. by<\/p>\n

                            Roth, G. & Wittich C. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA & London England: Uni-<\/p>\n

                            versity of California Press.<\/p>\n

                            http:\/\/www.public.iastate.edu\/~carlos\/607\/readings\/weber.pdf (12-12-2017)<\/p>\n

                            Weijers O. (1999). De la joute dialectique \u00e0 la dispute scolastique. In Comptes-rendus des<\/p>\n

                            s\u00e9ances de l\u2019Acad\u00e9mie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. 509-518.<\/p>\n

                            http:\/\/www.persee.fr\/web\/revues\/home\/prescript\/article\/crai_0065-<\/p>\n

                            0536_1999_num_143_2_16013. (12-12-2017)<\/p>\n

                            Wellman C. (1971). Challenge and Response. Justification in Ethics. Carbondale: Southern<\/p>\n

                            Illinois University Press.<\/p>\n

                            Wenzel J. (1987). The rhetorical perspective on argument. In F. van Eemeren, R.<\/p>\n

                            Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & C. A. Willard (eds) (1987). Vol. 1. 101-109.<\/p>\n

                            Whately R., [1828] = (1963). Elements of Rhetoric Comprising an Analysis of the Laws of Moral<\/p>\n

                            Evidence and of Persuasion, with Rules for Argumentative Composition and Elocution. Ed.<\/p>\n

                            by D. Ehninger. Foreword by D. Potter. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern<\/p>\n

                            Illinois UP.<\/p>\n

                            Whately R. [1832] = (1854). Elements of Logic. Louisville, KY: Morton & Griswald.<\/p>\n

                            Wikipedia, https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Main_Page.<\/p>\n

                            Willard C. A. (1989). A Theory of Argumentation. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama<\/p>\n

                            Press.<\/p>\n

                            Windisch U. (1987). Le KO Verbal – La Communication Conflictuelle. Lausanne: L\u2019\u00c2ge<\/p>\n

                            d\u2019Homme.<\/p>\n

                            Wittgenstein L. (1974). On Certainty \/ \u00dcber Gewissheit. Ed. by Anscombe G. E. M. & von<\/p>\n

                            Wright G. H.. Trans. by Paul D. & Anscombe G. E. M. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<\/p>\n

                            Woods J. & Walton D. N. (1989). Fallacies. Selected Papers 1972-1982. Dordrecht: Foris.<\/p>\n

                            616References<\/p>\n

                            Woods J. (2004). The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agent-Based Reasoning. Dordrecht:<\/p>\n

                            Kluwer.<\/p>\n

                            Woods J. (2009). Ignorance, inference and proof. Abductive logic meets the criminal<\/p>\n

                            law. In Tuzet G. & Canale D. (eds) The rules of inference: Inferentialism in Law and<\/p>\n

                            Philosophy. Heidelberg: Egea. 151-185.<\/p>\n

                            Woods J. (2013\/14). Errors Of Reasoning: Naturalizing the Logic of Inference. London: Col-<\/p>\n

                            lege Publications.<\/p>\n

                            Woods J. (2014). Aristotle’s Earlier Logic. 2nd edition, revised and expanded. London:<\/p>\n

                            College Publications.<\/p>\n

                            Wreen M. J. (1999). A few remarks on the individuation of arguments. In van Eemeren<\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. H., Grootendorst R., Blair J. A. & Willard C. A. (eds.) (1999). 884-888.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Wreen M. J. (2000). Review of Douglas Walton \u2018Argument from Ignorance\u2019<\/p>\n

                              . Argumentation<\/p>\n

                              14, 1. 51-56.<\/p>\n

                              Yates F. A. (1966). The Art of Memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.<\/p>\n

                              Yzerbit V. & Corneille O. (eds) (1994). La Persuasion. Lausanne: Delachaux & Niestl\u00e9.<\/p>\n

                              Amossy<\/em>, Ruth, 2014, Apologie de la\u00a0<\/em>pol\u00e9mique<\/em>. Paris, Presses universitaires de France.<\/p>\n

                              Aristote, Po\u00e9t<\/em>. = Po\u00e9tique<\/em>. Introduction, traduction\u2026\u00a0de Michel Magnien. Paris, LGF, 1990.<\/p>\n

                              Austin John L., [1962] \/ 1970. Quand dire c\u2019est faire <\/em>[How to do things with words<\/em>] Paris, Le Seuil.<\/p>\n

                              Bachelard, Gaston, 1938 La formation de l’esprit scientifique<\/em>. Paris, PUF 1938.<\/p>\n

                              Bennett Beth S. Hermagoras of Temnos (late second century BCE). In Michelle Ballif & Michael G. Moran (eds) Classical Rhetorics and Rhetoricians\u00a0: Critical studies and sources<\/em>. London, Praeger, p. 188-193<\/p>\n

                              Bentham, Jeremy. Sophismes parlementaires<\/em>. Traduction nouvelle d’apr\u00e8s la 2e<\/sup> \u00e9dition publi\u00e9e par le Dr Bowring. [\u2026]\u00a0par Elian Regnault. Paris, Pagnerre, 1840. https:\/\/gallica.bnf.fr\/ark:\/12148\/bpt6k9752830d.texteImage<\/p>\n

                              Benveniste, Cat\u00e9gorie de pens\u00e9e et cat\u00e9gorie de langue. Les \u00c9tudes philosophiques<\/em>, n\u00b0 4 (oct.-d\u00e9c. 1958. In PLG, Probl\u00e8mes de linguistique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale<\/em>, Paris, Gallimard, 1966. p. 63-74<\/p>\n

                              Blair, J. Anthony, 1996. Argument management, Informal Logic and Critical Thinking. In Blair 2012, p. 39-50.<\/p>\n

                              Blair, J. Anthony, 2012.<\/p>\n

                              Boethius [1978]\u00a0De Topicis differentiis<\/em>. Translated with Notes and Essays on the text, by Eleonore Stump. Cornell University Press.<\/p>\n

                              Booth, Wayne C, 1974. Modern Dogma and the rhetoric of assent<\/em>. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.<\/p>\n

                              Cadiot Anne, Chevalier Jean-Claude, Delesalle Simone, Garcia Claudine, Martinez Christine, Zedda Paolo 1979. \u00ab Oui mais, non mais \u00bb ou : II y a dialogue et dialogue. La pragmatique\u2014 Langue fran\u00e7aise<\/em>, 42.. pp. 94-102;<\/p>\n

                              Cic\u00e9ron, P. A. = Premiers<\/em> Acad\u00e9miques<\/em>. In \u0152uvres compl\u00e8tes de Cic\u00e9ron<\/em>, t. III, avec la traduction en fran\u00e7ais, publi\u00e9es sous la direction de M. Nisard, Paris, Dubochet, 1840, p. 469.<\/p>\n

                              Daremberg Charles, Saglio Edmond (dirs), 1877-1911. Dictionnaire des antiquit\u00e9s grecques et romaines<\/em>. Paris, Hachette. http:\/\/dagr.univ-tlse2.fr\/<\/p>\n

                              Detienne, Marcel, 1967 Les ma\u00eetres de v\u00e9rit\u00e9 dans la Gr\u00e8ce archa\u00efque. Paris, Maspero.<\/p>\n

                              de Pater, 1965. Les <\/em>Topiques d’Aristote et la dialectique platonicienne. La m\u00e9thodologie de la d\u00e9finition<\/em>. Fribourg, Editions Saint Paul.<\/p>\n

                              Estes Douglas Charles. 2013 The Questions of Jesus in John: Logic, rhetoric and persuasive discourse<\/em>. Leiden, Brill. Biblical Interpretation Series. 123-125<\/p>\n

                              Faure, Richard. 2012. La d\u00e9lib\u00e9ration et le subjonctif d\u00e9lib\u00e9ratif dans la prose grecque classique. Syntaktika<\/em> 43, p. 5-52. https:\/\/journals.openedition.org\/syntaktika\/124<\/a><\/p>\n

                              Fogelin Robert J., Duggan Timothy J., \u00ab Fallacies \u00bb, Argumentation<\/em>, 1, 3, 1987, p. 255-256.<\/p>\n

                              Freud, Sigmund (1923). Le moi et le \u00e7a. Traduction de l\u2019allemand par S. Jank\u00e9l\u00e9vitch en 1923, revue par l\u2019auteur. Cit\u00e9 d’apr\u00e8s https:\/\/www.psychaanalyse.com\/pdf\/Freud_le_moi_et_le_ca.pdf<\/a> Les classiques des sciences sociales<\/em>,\u00a0 http:\/\/www.uqac.uquebec.ca\/zone30\/Classiques_des_sciences_sociales\/index.html<\/p>\n

                              Gabbay D. M. & Woods J. (2003). Agenda Relevance: An Essay in Formal Pragmatics<\/em>. Amsterdam, North-Holland.<\/p>\n

                              Gabbay D. M. & Woods J. (2005). The Reach of Abduction: Insight and Trial<\/em>. Amsterdam, North-Holland.<\/p>\n

                              Graham, A. C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao \u2013 Philosophical argument in Ancient China<\/em>. Chicago, Open Court.
                              \n                              http:\/\/books.google.fr\/books?id=TkwTU6dFTyoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:Boethius&lr=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&as_brr=3&cd=2#v=onepage&q=&f=false<\/a><\/p>\n

                              Hart, Herbert L. A. 1948-49 The ascription of Responsability and Rights. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society<\/em>, New series, 49, pp. 171-194<\/p>\n

                              Jacobs Scott, Jackson Sally, 1982, Conversational argument : a discourse analytic approach. In Cox & Willard 1982.<\/p>\n

                              Kerbrat-Orecchioni Catherine, \u201cD\u00e9ambulation en territoire al\u00e9thique\u201d, in\u00a0Strat\u00e9gies discursives<\/em>, Lyon, PUL, 1978, pp. 53-102.<\/p>\n

                              L\u00e9vi-Strauss, Cl. (1962), La pens\u00e9e sauvage<\/em>. Paris, Plon.<\/p>\n

                              Maldidier D. 1990, L’inqui\u00e9tude du discours. Textes de Michel P\u00eacheux choisis et pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s par Denise Maldidier<\/em>. Paris\u00a0: Edition des Cendres.<\/p>\n

                              Maspero, Henri. 1927. Notes sur la logique de Mo-tseu et de son \u00e9cole. T’oung pao, XXV, 1-64. Cit\u00e9 d’apr\u00e8s l’\u00e9dition produite par Pierre Palpant. Chicoutimi, 2016. https:\/\/www.chineancienne.fr\/d%C3%A9but-20e-s\/maspero-henri\/maspero-notes-sur-la-logique-de-mo-tseu\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n

                              Masson-Oursel, Paul 1912. Esquisse d\u2019une th\u00e9orie compar\u00e9e du sorite. Revue de M\u00e9taphysique et de Morale<\/em>, 20e ann\u00e9e, n\u00b0 6, novembre 1912. 810-824. Cit\u00e9 d’apr\u00e8s Masson-Oursel, Paul. \u00c9tudes de philosophie compar\u00e9e<\/em>, p. 20. Produit par Pierre Palpant 2006, p.20<\/strong>. http:\/\/classiques.uqac.ca\/classiques\/masson_oursel_paul\/etudes_philo_comparee\/etudes_philo_comparee.html<\/a><\/p>\n

                              MW-LD = Merriam Webster Learner’s Dictionary<\/p>\n

                              Legrand Pierre, 2005, L\u2019Enseignement math\u00e9matique : un guide vers la pens\u00e9e ind\u00e9pendante. plot<\/em>, 10, 2005, p. 2-9. Cit\u00e9 d’apr\u00e8s https:\/\/www.apmep.fr\/IMG\/pdf\/Pensee_independante.pdf apmep\u00a0: Association des Professeurs de Math\u00e9matiques de l’Enseignement Public<\/p>\n

                              Quine, W. van O., Ullian, J. S., [1970] \/ 1982. The Web of Belief<\/em>. New York, Random House.<\/p>\n

                              Rahman, Shahid, Akuedotevi, Mawusse Kpakpo, 2010\/2015 Le syllogisme cat\u00e9gorique \u2014 Un aper\u00e7u g\u00e9n\u00e9ral \u00e0 partir de l\u2019Organon<\/em>, notamment des Premiers analytiques <\/em>d\u2019Aristote. https:\/\/halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr\/cel-01228907\/document<\/a><\/p>\n

                              R\u00e9gnier, Fran\u00e7ois, 2014. Consensus et\/ou Dissensus \u2014 en filigrane des interactions et du Pouvoir. Acad\u00e9mie lorraine des Sciences.
                              \n                              http:\/\/als.univ-lorraine.fr\/files\/conferences\/2014\/Regnier(12-06-14).pdf<\/a>).<\/p>\n

                              Robertson, D. W. Jr. and Olson, Paul A., \u00ab\u00a0Uncollected Essays\u00a0\u00bb (2017). Zea E-Books. 60. https:\/\/digitalcommons.unl.edu\/zeabook\/60<\/a><\/p>\n

                              Scriven, M. Probative logic: Review and preview. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & R. H. Johnson. Argumentation across the lines of discipline<\/em>, p. 7-32. Quoted in Blair 1996, p. 45-46.<\/p>\n

                              Thomas d’Aquin, Sec. An. Com.<\/em> = \u201cSeconds analytiques\u201d d’Aristote \u2013 Commentaire<\/em>. Traduit par Guy-Fran\u00e7ois Delaporte. Paris, L’Harmattan, 2014. P. 46<\/p>\n

                              Wheatley J. M. O, 1955. Deliberative questions. Analysis, Vol. 15, No. 3 (Jan., 1955), pp. 49-60. DOI: 10.2307\/3326941 \u2014\u00a0https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/3326941<\/a><\/p>\n

                               <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                              R\u00e9f\u00e9rences References Ad Her. = (1954). Rhetorica ad Herennium. Trans. by H. Caplan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. Adam J.-M. (1996). L\u2019argumentation dans le dialogue. Langue Fran\u00e7aise, 112. 31-49. Adorno Th. W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D. J. & Sanford R. N. (1950). The\u00a0 Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Row Agazzi E. (ed.) (1980). Modern Logic […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dictionnaire"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11576"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11576\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15421,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11576\/revisions\/15421"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}