{"id":1736,"date":"2021-04-18T05:04:35","date_gmt":"2021-04-18T03:04:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/?p=1736"},"modified":"2025-06-23T21:36:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-23T19:36:00","slug":"homonymy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/homonymy\/","title":{"rendered":"Homonymy"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #ff0000;\"><strong>HOMONYMY<\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n<p><span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">Two words are <i>homonyms<\/i>\u00a0when they have the<strong> same signifier but completely different meanings<\/strong>.<br \/>\nWhen a word develops different meanings derived from its basic meaning, those meanings overlap with the root&rsquo;s meaning. Such words are said <strong>polysemous<\/strong>, and are listed under the same dictionary entry.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The written signifier <strong><i>bark <\/i><\/strong>corresponds to four homonymous words<br \/>\n1. The typical cry of a dog.<br \/>\n2. A craft propelled by sails or oars.<br \/>\n3. The tough exterior covering of a woody root or stem.<br \/>\n4. The acronym for <em>beta-adrenergic receptor kinase.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>These homonyms are <strong>homographs<\/strong> (same spelling) and <strong>homophones<\/strong> (same pronunciation). <strong>Heteronyms<\/strong> are<em> words that have <\/em>the <em>same spelling<\/em> but <em>different pronunciations<\/em> and meanings; they are homographs, but not homophones. [1]\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">1. <em>Tear<\/em> (N) (from eyes), = <span class=\"primary-pron\"><span class=\"pron-info\" data-pron-region=\"UK\"><span class=\"soundfile\"> <span class=\"daud t tb fs16 lmr-15\">UK <\/span><\/span><span class=\"pron\" data-title=\"Written pronunciation\">\/<span class=\"ipa\">t\u026a\u0259<span class=\"sp dsp \">r<\/span><\/span>\/<\/span><\/span><\/span><br \/>\n2. <em>(To) tear<\/em> (V ~ to rip up) = UK <span class=\"primary-pron\"><span class=\"pron-info\" data-pron-region=\"UK\"><span class=\"pron\" data-title=\"Written pronunciation\">\/<span class=\"ipa\">te\u0259<span class=\"sp dsp \">r<\/span><\/span>\/<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; color: #0000ff;\">1. Sophisms of Homonymy<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Plato&rsquo;s dialogue, <i>Euthydemus<\/i>, provides an example of the sophistical use of\u00a0 homonyms. The eponymous character of this dialogue, Euthydemus the Sophist, successively demonstrates the contradictory propositions: \u201cIt is the <span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">learned<\/span> who learn\u201d and \u201cIt is the <span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">ignorant<\/span> who learn\u201d (<i>Euth.<\/i>, V, 275c-276c; p. 114). The listeners, particularly the young Clinias, are completely dumbfounded.<br \/>\nAs Socrates explains, the same word applies to people who are in opposite conditions, to those who know and to those who do not know\u201d (ibid., p. 111). The teacher teaches the student, and the student learns from the teacher.<br \/>\nSuch <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/sophisme-sophiste\/\">sophistries<\/a> do not intend to <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/persuasion\/\">persuade<\/a> people of falsehoods, but rather\u00a0to confuse and exasperate their victims by <span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">revealing the underlying complexities and contradictions of their spontaneous beliefs and expressions.<\/span> They are the ancestors of modern deconstructionists.<\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; color: #0000ff;\">2. Paralogism of Homonymy<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The fallacy of homonymy is a fallacy of ambiguity, related to speech, s<a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/fallacieux-3\/\">ee fallacious: Aristotle. <\/a>In the theory of syllogistic reasoning, a <span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\"><a style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/evaluation-syllogisme\/\">syllogism that is fallacious <\/a>by homonymy has not three but <strong>four terms<\/strong><\/span>, one of which has two different meanings<b>.<br \/>\n<\/b>The following paralogism consists of four terms: <em>Metals are simple bodies; b<\/em><em>ronze is a metal: <\/em>Therefore <em>bronze is a simple body.<br \/>\n<\/em>However, bronze is an alloy, not a simple body. In the minor premise, bronze is said to be a metal because it resembles authentic metals such as iron, it can be melted and formed. In the major premise, <em>metal<\/em> is used in its strict sense. However, \u00ab\u00a0metal\u00a0\u00bb is homonymous or polysemous, so the syllogism actually articulates four terms, having four distincts meanings.<\/p>\n<p>Scientific language prohibits homonymic shifts and requires the use of unambiguously defined terms with stable meanings and syntax. In natural reasoning, the meaning of terms is constructed and reconstructed as the discourse progresses, see<a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/object-of-discourse-e\/\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> d<\/span>iscourse object<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">A question of homonymy generally arises <b>when a term&rsquo;s meaning changes from one stage of reasoning to another, <\/b>or, from one discussion to another.<\/span> This change in meaning, can occur through homonymy, polysemy, or by taking a term in its literal sense and then in a figurative sense.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, a discussion about <em>granting<\/em> <i>credit to a person <\/i>may waver between setting the <i>amount of a loan <\/i>and the <i>trust <\/i>placed in that person. In German, it is said that discussions about <i>financial debt <\/i>remain linked to discussions about <i>moral fault, <\/i>because the same term, <i>Schuld<\/i>, has both meanings.<a href=\"#_ftn1\">[1]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/distinguo\/\"><i>distinguo <\/i><\/a>strategy can be used to refute discourse that plays on homonymy.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n[1] http:\/\/dictionnaire. reverso.net\/allemand-francais\/schuld, (20 09-2013)<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>HOMONYMY Two words are homonyms\u00a0when they have the same signifier but completely different meanings. When a word develops different meanings derived from its basic meaning, those meanings overlap with the root&rsquo;s meaning. Such words are said polysemous, and are listed under the same dictionary entry. The written signifier bark corresponds to four homonymous words 1. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1736"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1736\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14437,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1736\/revisions\/14437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}