{"id":4586,"date":"2021-10-15T15:50:23","date_gmt":"2021-10-15T13:50:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/?p=4586"},"modified":"2025-08-12T10:35:48","modified_gmt":"2025-08-12T08:35:48","slug":"ad-incommodum-e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/ad-incommodum-e\/","title":{"rendered":"Ad incommodum"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><em><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #ff0000;\">AD INCOMMODUM<\/span><\/em><\/h1>\n<p>Bossuet [1] defines the <em>ad incommodum <\/em>argument[1] as \u201cthe argument that brings one into inconvenience\u201d ([1677], p. 131). It is a variant of the refutative use of <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/pragmatic-argument-e\/\">pragmatic argument<\/a> through unacceptable or contradictory consequences, see <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/absurd-eng\/\">absurd<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>This pattern\u00a0 is illustrated with an example designed to refute the doctrines of opponents of absolute political power over bodies and absolute ecclesiastical authority over souls.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Without political authority to which one obeys without resistance, men would devour one another. Likewise, if there were no ecclesiastical authority to which individuals are obliged to submit their judgment, there would be as many religions as there are heads. However, it is false that we should allow people to devour one another, or that there should be as many religions as there are heads. Therefore, we must necessarily recognize a political authority to which we submit without resistance, and an ecclesiastical authority to which individuals yield their judgment.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Bishop Jacques-B\u00e9nigne Bossuet, <em>Logic for the Dauphin, <\/em><em>p. 131.<\/em> [1990].<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The refutation takes the form of two hypothetical syllogisms:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Without Absolute Political Authority, men would Devour each other: <em>no APA \u2192 D<br \/>\n<\/em>Without Absolute Religious Authority, religions would Multiply: <em>no ARA \u2192 M<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Men must not Devour each other: <em>no D<br \/>\n<\/em>Religions must not Multiply: <em>no M<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Therefore, we need absolute political authority: <em>AP<br \/>\n<\/em>Therefore, we need absolute religious authority: <em>AR<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The two arguments are presented in strict parallel. This textual or stylistic turn fuses and freezes the two arguments, and therefore the two powers, to the point of their identification [2]. See <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/k_cas-parallele\/\">parallel cases<\/a> (in French).<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">[<a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/ad-incommodum\/#_ftnref1\">1]<\/a> Bishop Jacques B\u00e9nigne Bossuet, (1627-1704). In <em>Logique du Dauphin<\/em> \/ <em>Logic for the Dauphin<\/em>., 1677. The Dauphin is the heir apparent of the French Kingdom. Quoted after Paris, \u00c9ditions universitaires, 1990, p. 131.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">[2] This identification excludes, for example, the plurality of religions in an absolute monarchy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AD INCOMMODUM Bossuet [1] defines the ad incommodum argument[1] as \u201cthe argument that brings one into inconvenience\u201d ([1677], p. 131). It is a variant of the refutative use of pragmatic argument through unacceptable or contradictory consequences, see absurd. This pattern\u00a0 is illustrated with an example designed to refute the doctrines of opponents of absolute political [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4586","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4586","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4586"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4586\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14671,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4586\/revisions\/14671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4586"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4586"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4586"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}