{"id":4594,"date":"2021-10-15T15:59:39","date_gmt":"2021-10-15T13:59:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/?p=4594"},"modified":"2025-03-28T07:22:06","modified_gmt":"2025-03-28T06:22:06","slug":"agreement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/agreement\/","title":{"rendered":"Agreement"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #ff0000;\">AGREEMENT<\/span><\/h1>\n<p>Agreement can be viewed from four perspectives.<\/p>\n<p>(1) Consensual interactions are characterized by a <strong><em>preference for agreement<\/em> <\/strong>(Bilmes 1991), see <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/politeness\/\">Politeness<\/a>. Fully developed argumentative interactions are characterized by a <strong><em>preference for <\/em><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><em><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/disagreement-e\/\">disagreement<\/a><\/span><\/em><\/span>,<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>(2)\u00a0<em>The existence of <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>\u201cpreliminary agreements\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/em> (Perelman, Olbrechts-Tyteca), in regard to both in terms of the organization of the discussion and the issues to be discussed, can be considered as a necessary condition for a fruitful conclusion of the argument. In a dialectical exchange, prior specific agreements are <em>imposed<\/em> on the participants, just as the rules of a game are imposed on the players. In a rhetorical address, the speaker seeks <em>a priori<\/em> areas of agreement with the audience.<br \/>\nIn civic life, argumentative encounters (courts, arbitration offices, parliaments, decision-making meetings\u2026) follow predetermined standard procedures that the participants agree to and follow,\u00a0 whether they consider them fair or not. See <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/rules-e\/\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Rules<\/span><\/a><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">;<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/conditions-of-discussion-e\/\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Conditions of Discussion<\/span>.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>(3) <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><em>The production of an agreement<\/em><\/span><\/strong> can be seen as the ideal purpose of argumentative interactions. Combined with (2), this makes argumentation a technique for transforming preliminary agreements into a final consensus. See <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/persuading-convincing-eng\/\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">To persuade<\/span><\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/persuasion-eng\/\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Persuasion<\/span>.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>(4) <em>T<strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">he existence of a <\/span><\/strong><\/em><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><em>consensus can be used as an argument<\/em>,<\/span><\/strong> to justify a proposal by claiming that it is the subject of a general consensus on which everyone agrees. The actual opponent of the claim thus appears therefore as an isolated eccentric individual, excluded from \u00ab\u00a0our community\u00a0\u00bb. His or her opinion is disqualified, and can be dismissed without bothering to refute or even consider his or her arguments, See <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/dismissal-e\/\">Dismissal<\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AGREEMENT Agreement can be viewed from four perspectives. (1) Consensual interactions are characterized by a preference for agreement (Bilmes 1991), see Politeness. Fully developed argumentative interactions are characterized by a preference for disagreement, (2)\u00a0The existence of \u201cpreliminary agreements\u201d (Perelman, Olbrechts-Tyteca), in regard to both in terms of the organization of the discussion and the issues [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4594","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4594","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4594"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4594\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5809,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4594\/revisions\/5809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4594"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4594"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4594"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}