{"id":4724,"date":"2021-10-17T18:48:27","date_gmt":"2021-10-17T16:48:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/?p=4724"},"modified":"2025-03-28T23:34:10","modified_gmt":"2025-03-28T22:34:10","slug":"burden-of-proof-e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/burden-of-proof-e\/","title":{"rendered":"Burden of Proof"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000; font-size: 14pt;\"><strong>BURDEN OF PROOF<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The burden of proof [1] plays a fundamental role in argumentation. It is a conservative principle of action in general, like the principle of inertia in physics: \u201c<em>I carry on as before, unless I have a good reason to change<\/em>\u201d. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Mill tells an anecdote that vividly illustrates the heavy burden of proof that a conservative society imposed on social innovators, see <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/calm\/\">calm<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The propounder of a new truth, according to this doctrine should stand, as stood, in the legislation of the Locrians, the proposer of a new law, with a halter round his neck, to be instantly tightened if the public assembly did not, on hearing his reasons, then and there adopt his proposition. People who defend this mode of treating benefactors, cannot be supposed to set much value on the benefit; and I believe this view of the subject is mostly confined to the sort of persons who think that new truths may have been desirable once, but that we have had enough of them now. ([1859]. p. 88)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><strong>In a court of law,<\/strong> the burden of proof is expressed in the presumption of innocence \u201c<em>a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty<\/em>\u201d; that is, the accusation must provide positive evidence of the guilt of the accused. The stabilization of the burden of proof is an institutional decision that organizes the situation; the last word is left to the accused.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\"><strong>In informal social debates<\/strong>, there is no clear preliminary agreement on who supports the burden of proof, and the proponent can try to shift it to the opponent. \u200b\u200bIt becomes a stake in the debate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/doxa-e\/\"><em>doxa<\/em><\/a> can be defined according to the same principle: an <em>endoxon<\/em>, i.e. an element of the doxa, is best defined not as a \u201cprobable\u201d belief, but as a belief that does not support the burden of proof, and is, therefore, considered to be \u201cnormal\u201d by the given group. The individual who challenges an <em>accepted<\/em> proposition bears the burden of proof, and must provide good reasons. This is why Descartes, ready to reject all his previously established beliefs, must support this radical doubt with the hypothesis of the Evil Genius (Descartes [1641], <em>First Meditation<\/em>). S. <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/rules-e\/\">Rules<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">When it comes to current trends and fashions, the burden of proof is reversed: \u201c<em>it(s new, it just came out!<\/em>\u201d is a direct argument for buying the product in question. On the contray, good reasons are needed <em>not <\/em>to follow fashion, <em>not<\/em> to adopt new theories, and <em>not<\/em> to vot for the emerging candidate.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; color: #0000ff;\"><strong><span style=\"font-size: 14pt;\">Burden of proof and initiative<\/span> <\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Hamblin has redefined the burden of proof in a language game as being on the player who takes the initiative, i.e. makes the first move. This definition can be applied to highly argumentative multi-speaker interactions, where the first turn of speech is usually assigned to the person who supports the proposal under discussion. In a debate on the legalisation of drugs, the facilitator will ask the first question to a supporter of legalization, not to an opponent.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The burden of proof is on a question and a proposal. If the opponent proposalmakes a counter-proposal, he will bear the corresponding burden of proof.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The burden of proof may vary depending on the group involved, and where the debate takes place. If the doxa of the group is that there should be no prohibition of drug use, then, in this group, the <em>supporter<\/em> of the prohibition will have to justify his position.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">[1] Latin <em>onus probandi<\/em>; Lat. <em>onus<\/em> \u201ccharge, burden\u201d; <em>probandi<\/em>, from <em>probare<\/em> \u201cto make believable, to make accept, to prove\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BURDEN OF PROOF The burden of proof [1] plays a fundamental role in argumentation. It is a conservative principle of action in general, like the principle of inertia in physics: \u201cI carry on as before, unless I have a good reason to change\u201d. Mill tells an anecdote that vividly illustrates the heavy burden of proof [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4724","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4724"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4724\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13850,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4724\/revisions\/13850"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}