{"id":4826,"date":"2021-10-19T11:00:46","date_gmt":"2021-10-19T09:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/?p=4826"},"modified":"2025-03-07T11:49:17","modified_gmt":"2025-03-07T10:49:17","slug":"convergent-linked-serial-e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/convergent-linked-serial-e\/","title":{"rendered":"Convergent \u2014 Linked \u2014 Serial"},"content":{"rendered":"

CONVERGENT, LINKED, SERIAL<\/span> Argumentation<\/span><\/h1>\n

The conclusion of an argumentation is usually expressed in a single statement, possibly expanded in a short closing speech, see Argument – Conclusion<\/a>.
\nThe arguments, i.e., the part of the argumentative discourse that supports and sometimes surrounds the conclusion, can be considerably developed along quite different lines:<\/p>\n

\u2014 Convergent argumentation<\/em><\/a>, also called multiple argumentation<\/em>, combines several co-oriented arguments.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Linked argumentation<\/em><\/a>, also called coordinate argumentation<\/em> consists of several statements that combine to form an argument.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2014 Serial argumentation<\/em><\/a>, also called subordinate argumentation<\/em> consist of a sequence of argumentations, such as the conclusion<\/em> of the first one is taken as an argument<\/em> to support a second one and so on, see sorite.<\/a><\/p>\n

One caveat: these categories are logical categories; they assume that arguments correspond to clean-cut, continuous explicit linguistic segments, just like premises in a logical reasoning. This is not the case in ordinary language, where arguments can be intertwined, an argument can contain another argument,\u00a0 and episodes of expository language can take a distinctly argumentative turn. See Tagging<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CONVERGENT, LINKED, SERIAL Argumentation The conclusion of an argumentation is usually expressed in a single statement, possibly expanded in a short closing speech, see Argument – Conclusion. The arguments, i.e., the part of the argumentative discourse that supports and sometimes surrounds the conclusion, can be considerably developed along quite different lines: \u2014 Convergent argumentation, also […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4826"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4826\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5987,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4826\/revisions\/5987"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}