{"id":5162,"date":"2021-10-21T16:56:23","date_gmt":"2021-10-21T14:56:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/?p=5162"},"modified":"2025-06-03T15:01:46","modified_gmt":"2025-06-03T13:01:46","slug":"non-contradiction-principle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/non-contradiction-principle\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-Contradiction Principle (e)"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">NON-CONTRADICTION PRINCIPLE<\/span><\/h2>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-size: 12pt;\">1. In logic<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>In logic, the principle of non-contradiction prohibits the affirmation of contradictory propositions. In other words:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">\u2014\u00a0The conjunction \u201c<strong>P<\/strong> and <strong>not-P<\/strong>\u201d is a contradiction, and, as such, is a self-destructive proposition, that is necessarily <em>false<\/em>.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">\u2014\u00a0The disjunction \u201c<strong>P<\/strong> or <strong>not-P<\/strong>\u201d is necessarily <em>true<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>One of the two propositions <strong>P<\/strong> or <strong>not-P<\/strong> must be true, both cannot be true at the same time. The same thing cannot both <em>be<\/em> and <em>not be<\/em>. This principle is considered\u00a0 as a <em>law of thought <\/em>in classical logic and an <em>axiom<\/em> in contemporary logic. A logical system that respects the principle of non-contradiction contains no <em>antinomies<\/em> and\u00a0 is said to be <em>consistent<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Negation\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<\/strong>Using the truth table method, the negation operator is defined as follows:<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 35.68%; height: 133px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>P<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>\u00ac<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>P <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">T<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">F<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">F<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">T<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>This table expresses the principle of the excluded middle. It reads:<\/p>\n<p>Line 1: &lsquo;if P is true, then not-P is false&rsquo;.<br \/>\nLine 2: &lsquo;if P is false, then not-P is true&rsquo;.<\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-size: 12pt;\">2. In natural language<\/span><\/h1>\n<p>The application of the non-contradiction principle to everyday language is complex, because:<br \/>\n\u2014 It presupposes that <strong>P<\/strong> is either unambiguously true or false, not <em>far from true<\/em> or <em>practically false<\/em>, true or not <em>according to the circumstances<\/em>.<br \/>\n\u2014 There are natural language utterances that cannot be said to be either true or false, such as \u00ab\u00a0<em>Come back tomorrow!<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb or \u00ab\u00a0<em>I promise to come back tomorrow<\/em>.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Many forms of argument appeal to the principle of non-contradiction , albeit under different names. See <em>a<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/ad-hominem-2\/\"><em>d hominem<\/em><\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/dialectic-e\/\">dialectic<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/contradiction-e\/\">contradiction<\/a>; <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/consistency-e\/\">consistency<\/a><strong>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The principle of non-contradiction applies not only to logical and argumentative discourse, but to any kind of discourse. Inconsistent <em>narratives<\/em> or <em>descriptions<\/em> for example, are rejected as such.<\/p>\n<p>According to the basic rule of Aristotelian dialectic, any discourse that leads to a contradiction is irrational and must be abandoned. Hegelian dialectics sees the motor of history in the ongoing treatment of contradictions. Cynical politicians can invoke Hegel to hide their opportunism:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Stalin&rsquo;s speech on the Five-Year Plan serves as a passionate apology for contradiction as a \u201c<em>vital value<\/em>\u201d and an \u201c<em>instrument of struggle<\/em>\u201d. One of Lenin&rsquo;s great strengths was his ability never to feel imprisonned by what he had preached as true the day before. Mussolini&rsquo;s famous words \u201c<em>Let us beware of the deadly trap of coherence<\/em>\u201d could be endorsed by anyone intending to work within unpredictable currents they cannot.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Julien Benda, [<em>The Betrayal of the Intellectuals<\/em>], [1927]<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Affirming of a paradox as an <em>oxymoron<\/em> enables one to endure the contradiction: \u201c<em>O wound without scar!<\/em>\u201d. Rather than being deemed absurd or fallacious and dismissed, such a paradoxical assertion triggers a search for the deeper, symbolic meaning of the words <em>wound<\/em> and <em>scar<\/em> used in this context.<br \/>\nThis interpretive approach goes a step further than hastily dismissing it as a\u00a0 \u201cfallacy\u201d.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> Julien Benda, <em>La Trahison des Clercs<\/em>, [1927]. Excerpt from the <em>preface<\/em> to the 1946 edition. Paris: Grasset, 1975, pp. 78-79.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NON-CONTRADICTION PRINCIPLE 1. In logic In logic, the principle of non-contradiction prohibits the affirmation of contradictory propositions. In other words: \u2014\u00a0The conjunction \u201cP and not-P\u201d is a contradiction, and, as such, is a self-destructive proposition, that is necessarily false. \u2014\u00a0The disjunction \u201cP or not-P\u201d is necessarily true. One of the two propositions P or not-P [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5162"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5162\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14326,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5162\/revisions\/14326"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}