{"id":5391,"date":"2021-10-23T11:45:43","date_gmt":"2021-10-23T09:45:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/?p=5391"},"modified":"2025-05-12T18:34:39","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T16:34:39","slug":"relation-e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/relation-e\/","title":{"rendered":"Relation"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #ff0000;\">RELATIONS<\/span><\/h1>\n<p>A relation is a two-place predicate <strong>R<\/strong> that associates two objects, <strong>a<\/strong> and <strong>b. <\/strong>This is denoted by \u201ca<strong>R<\/strong>b\u201d. Relations are characterized by three general properties, <em>symmetry<\/em>, <em>transitivity<\/em>, and<em> reflexivity<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; <em>Symmetry, or reciprocity<\/em>: The same relationship holds between <strong>a<\/strong> and <strong>b<\/strong> and <strong>b <\/strong>and <strong>a<\/strong>.<br \/>\n&#8211; <em>Reflexivity<\/em>: The relationship connects an object to itself.<br \/>\n&#8211; <em>Transitivity<\/em>: The relationship connecting <strong>a<\/strong> to <strong>b<\/strong> and <strong>b<\/strong> to <strong>c<\/strong> also connects <strong>a<\/strong> to <strong>c<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-size: 12pt;\">1. Symmetry, or reciprocity<\/span><\/h1>\n<p>A relation is <em>s<span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">ymmetric <\/span><\/em><span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">or<a style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\" href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/reciprocity\/\"><em> reciprocal<\/em><\/a> if it relates both <strong>a<\/strong> to <strong>b<\/strong> and <strong>b<\/strong> to <strong>a<\/strong>.<br \/>\nIn other words, both \u201c<strong>aRb<\/strong>\u201d and \u201c<strong>bRa<\/strong>\u201d hold.<\/span><br \/>\nIf <strong>a<\/strong> loves <strong>b<\/strong>, <strong>b<\/strong> does not necessarily love <strong>a<\/strong>: a love relationship is not symmetrical.<br \/>\n\u201c<em>Meeting<\/em>\u201d is a symmetric relationship. The following argument is no more or less logical than any other, but it would be a valid point in a detective novel. It can only be rejected by accusing Peter of lying.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">If Peter confessed to meeting Paul at the bar, then we must assume that Paul met Peter. Paul cannot deny the obvious.<\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-size: 12pt;\">2. Reflexivity<\/span><\/h1>\n<p><span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">A <em>reflexive<\/em> relation relates a being to itself. It is noted \u201c<strong>aRa<\/strong>\u201d.<\/span><br \/>\n\u201c\u2014 <em>Being contemporary of \u2014<\/em>\u201d is a reflexive relationship: <strong>a<\/strong> is his own strict contemporary.<br \/>\nFor the average person, the causal relationship is not reflexive. Only God is <em>causa sui<\/em>, his own cause.<\/p>\n<p>The reflexive relation can be used <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/ad-hominem-2\/\"><em>ad hominem<\/em><\/a>. For example, the principle \u201c<em>charity begins at home<\/em>\u201d for example forces the reflexivity of the relationship \u201c<strong>a<\/strong> makes charity to <strong>b<\/strong>\u201d. Nevertheless, the love of others can be used to encourage self-care:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">If you love all humanity, then you should try to love yourself as well!<\/span><\/p>\n<p>A counselor&rsquo;s competence can be challenged by inviting them to make a reflexive use of their talents:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Doctor, heal thyself!<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Such replies correspond to the <em>ad hominem<\/em> variety, setting up practices against words.<\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-size: 12pt;\">3. Transitivity<\/span><\/h1>\n<p>A relation is transitive if, <span style=\"background-color: #ffff00;\">when it connects <strong>a<\/strong> to <strong>b<\/strong> and <strong>b<\/strong> to <strong>c<\/strong>, then it also connects <strong>a<\/strong> to <strong>c<\/strong>.<\/span><br \/>\nIn other words, \u201c<strong>aRb<\/strong> and <strong>bRc<\/strong>\u201d implies that \u201c<strong>aRc<\/strong>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>However if <strong>a<\/strong> loves <strong>b<\/strong>, and if <strong>b<\/strong> loves <strong>c<\/strong>, then <strong>a<\/strong> does not necessarily love <strong>c.<\/strong> Thus a relationship of love is not transitive.<br \/>\nThe relation \u201c<em>being the father of <\/em>\u201d is not transitive, but \u201c<em>being an ancestor of<\/em>\u201d is transitive. If <strong>a<\/strong> is an ancestor of <strong>b<\/strong> and if <strong>b<\/strong> is an ancestor of <strong>c<\/strong>, then <strong>a<\/strong> is an ancestor of <strong>c<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>These inferences based on the transitivity of a predicate apply whenever at least three objects are positioned on a graduated scale.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">If <strong>a<\/strong> is bigger, older, richer &#8230; than <strong>b<br \/>\n<\/strong>and <strong>b<\/strong> larger, older, richer &#8230; than <strong>c<\/strong>,<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Then a is bigger, older, richer &#8230; than <strong>c<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>These inferences are part of the unnoticed evidence exploited by everyday reasoning and argument. They are sometimes considered to be \u201cquasi-logical\u201d, see <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/quasi-logical-arguments-e\/\">quasi-logic<\/a>; but <em>being\u00a0sound and valid<\/em> does not preclude <em>being an argument<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-size: 12pt;\">4. Conversion<\/span><\/h1>\n<p>S. <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/conversion-e\/\">Conversion<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RELATIONS A relation is a two-place predicate R that associates two objects, a and b. This is denoted by \u201caRb\u201d. Relations are characterized by three general properties, symmetry, transitivity, and reflexivity: &#8211; Symmetry, or reciprocity: The same relationship holds between a and b and b and a. &#8211; Reflexivity: The relationship connects an object to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5391","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5391","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5391"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5391\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14278,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5391\/revisions\/14278"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5391"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5391"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5391"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}