{"id":6062,"date":"2021-10-31T14:59:16","date_gmt":"2021-10-31T13:59:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/?p=6062"},"modified":"2025-08-01T17:54:37","modified_gmt":"2025-08-01T15:54:37","slug":"distinguo-e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/distinguo-e\/","title":{"rendered":"Distinguo"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14pt; color: #ff0000;\"><strong>DISTINGUO<\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">The Latin term <em>distinguo<\/em>,\u00a0 is the first-person singular present indicative of the Latin verb <em>distinguere<\/em>, which means \u201cto separate; to distinguish\u201d. By extension, <em>distinguo<\/em> can also mean \u00ab\u00a0to make a subtle, hence sophistical distinction.\u00a0\u00bb<br \/>\n<\/span><em>Distinguo<\/em> is a an argumentative technique used to clarify the meaning of a term. In an argumentative situation, <em>distinguo<\/em> is used to prevent misinterpretation and <em>objection<\/em> by opponents.<br \/>\nThe term \u00a0<em>distinguo<\/em> is also used as a synonym for <em>paradiastole<\/em>, see <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/orientation-reversal-e\/\">orientation reversal<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h1><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-size: 12pt;\">1. <em>Distinguo<\/em> as an Analytical Tool<\/span><\/h1>\n<p>In contemporary usage, to make a <em>distinguo<\/em> is to make a distinction between the different meanings covered by\u00a0 a complex or ambiguous notion<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">(1) The system of \u2018territorial development\u2019 is based on the interaction between its two components: the local economic system and the so-called \u2018territorial\u2019 system.<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">The <em>distinguo<\/em> between these two systems stems from the opposing logics underlying them. The economic system obeys principles that are recognized and explained in economics. The territorial system, for its part, encompasses all human, social, economic and urban functions of a place.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Loinger &amp; J.-C. Nemery, [<em>Recomposition and Development of Territories<\/em>], 1998.<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">2. <em>Distinguo<\/em> as a First Step to Refuting an Argument<\/span><br \/>\n<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>A distinguo is an instrument used to reduce <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/ambiguity\/\">ambiguity<\/a>, it conveys the caveat, \u201c<em>Be careful not to mix everything up!<\/em>\u201d. A distinguo is justified when based on distinctions that are socially recognized and independently established in a dictionary or an encyclopedia.<br \/>\nFor example, it can be used to detect a four-term <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/5318-2\/\">paralogism <\/a>, or a shift in the meaning of a term in a reasoning, such as eliminate the confusion created by using the word <em>metal<\/em> to refer to <em>a chemically simple body<\/em> and to <em>an alloy<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>A distinguo can be used to correct an opponent&rsquo;s discourse,\u00a0 for example to reestablish a blurred distinction (Mackenzie 1988). Making a <em>distinguo<\/em> is saying, \u201c<em>I see<\/em><em> some truth and some errors in your speech, and I&rsquo;m going to clarify the situation.<\/em>\u201d<br \/>\nConsider the following theological syllogism (after Chenique, 1975, p. 9):<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">(1) Every man is a sinner.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">(2) No sinner will enter heaven.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">(3) No man will enter heaven.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The opponent says:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">I agree with premise (1), \u201c<em>every man is a sinner<\/em>.\u00a0\u00bb<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">In premise (2), \u201c<em>No sinner shall enter Heaven<\/em>\u201d, <em>distinguo<\/em>, I distinguish two different statements:<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">(2a) \u201c(No sinner) <em>as a sinner<\/em> shall enter Heaven\u201d, I agree: \u201c<em>No man in a state of sin will enter Heaven.<\/em>\u201d<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">(2b) \u201c(No sinner) <em>as a forgiven<\/em> sinner shall enter Heaven\u201d: I deny this proposition.<br \/>\nThe <em>distinguo<\/em> does not relate to the meaning of the word <em>sinner<\/em>, but rather to two categories of sinners.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Therefore, I reject your conclusion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The opponent objects that the syllogism is fallacious, because the minor is true in one sense, and false in the other.<br \/>\nThis is not a case of a four-terms syllogism that is fallacious by homonymy, see p<a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/5318-2\/\">aralogism<\/a><strong>.<\/strong> <em>Sinner<\/em> is not ambiguous by homonymy, but because, it can be construed in two different ways in a theological context.<\/p>\n<p>The distinguo is a figure traditionally dismissed as being \u201cscholastic\u201d, and used to draw spurious oppositions. Thomas Diafoirus courts Ang\u00e9lique, who hates him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><em>Ang\u00e9lique:<\/em> \u2014 But the greatest mark of love is to submit to the will of the one you love.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><em>Thomas Diafoirus: <\/em>\u2014\u00a0<em>Distinguo<\/em>, madam. I concede [<em>concedo<\/em>] In what does not have to do with possessing her, <em>concedo<\/em>; but in what does have to do with it, I negate [<em>nego<\/em>].<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Moli\u00e8re, [<em>The Imaginary Invalid<\/em>], [1673]<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Thomas Diafoirus is pedantic and brutal. He claims his right <em>to possess<\/em> Ang\u00e9lique, against her will. Apart from this, however, he is ready to submit to her will. The distinction is equivalent to \u00ab\u00a0I agree except when I disagree.\u201d<br \/>\nA distinguo prevents or rectifies ambiguities, but when it introduces distinctions into a perfectly clear expression, it can itself cause confusion itself.<\/p>\n<p>In these cases, the <em>distinguo<\/em> may or may not be accepted depending on the value of the distinction made. In the case of the sinner, the distinction might be justified by the parallel case of the criminal. A criminal who has served his sentence cannot be called a criminal without qualification, one cannot say, \u201c<em>He is a criminal, let&rsquo;s call the police!<\/em>\u201d. A distinction is clearly necessary.<br \/>\nHowever, in the case of Ang\u00e9lique, the distinction is arbitrary and ad hoc. It can be countered with a third round of speech such as, \u00ab\u00a0<em>Stop it now! Enough with your scholastic distinguos!<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0, <em>\u00ab\u00a0Stop quibbling please, you are obnoxious!\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; color: #0000ff;\">3. Distinguo and <a href=\"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/dissociation-e\/\">Dissociation<\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>According to Perelman, the dissociation technique is, \u201chardly mentioned by traditional rhetoric, for it is especially important for the analysis of systematic philosophical thought as systematic.\u201d (1977, p. 139). For example Kant believed that natural sciences postulate a universal <em>determinism <\/em>while morality postulates the <em>liberty <\/em>of the individual. Thus, the term reality, a confused notion, is\u00a0 dissociated, into a <em>phenomenal <\/em>reality, where determinism reigns, and a <em>noumenal <\/em>reality where individuals can freely choose and act on their decision.<br \/>\nAccording to Kant (not to Marx) these two types of reality are in a complementary oppositional. relationship.<\/p>\n<p>Rhetorical distinguo nullifies one of the opposed domains, which is not the case of dissociation.<\/p>\n<p>Ancient rhetoric has the concept of distinguo. The distinguo is an operation of clarification carried out on a concept considered as possibly \u00ab\u00a0confusing\u00a0\u00bb. To clarify the concept, the distinguo performs a kind of content analysis to rearrange the semantic and cognitive contents of the word in different subdomains, for example to clearly define the position of the subject of an investigation, as in example (1), (\u00a71 supra)<br \/>\nSuch an operation is the basic task of the lexicographer when she decides whether the signifier to be defined has only one meaning, or several related meanings (polysemy), or several unrelated meanings (homonymy). At this point, the operation does not involve any special treatment or evaluation of the relatively independent semantic or cognitive subdomains.<br \/>\nDissociation goes one steps further by deciding that one of these components is to be evaluated positively, the other negatively and considered negligible for the discussion of the other component.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> Loinger G. &amp; Nemery J.-C.. <em>Recomposition et D\u00e9veloppement des Territoires<\/em>, Paris: L&rsquo;Harmattan, 1998. P. 126.<br \/>\n<a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> Moli\u00e8re, <em>Le Malade imaginaire<\/em> [1673], act II, scene 6. Quoted after Ch. Franks, D. Lettau, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/files\/9070\/9070-h\/9070-h.htm\">http:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/files\/9070\/9070-h\/9070-h.htm<\/a> (11-08-2017)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DISTINGUO The Latin term distinguo,\u00a0 is the first-person singular present indicative of the Latin verb distinguere, which means \u201cto separate; to distinguish\u201d. By extension, distinguo can also mean \u00ab\u00a0to make a subtle, hence sophistical distinction.\u00a0\u00bb Distinguo is a an argumentative technique used to clarify the meaning of a term. In an argumentative situation, distinguo is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6062"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6062\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14641,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6062\/revisions\/14641"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}