Constructing \/ exploiting a reality<\/p>\n
arguing to construct a relation or a property \u2014 arguing from a relation, appealing to a relation or a property<\/p>\n
Four basic relations and properties : argumentative construction and argumentative exploitation<\/p>\n
Four basic argument schemes<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Before living in a house, you must first build it. Before using an analogy, you must first show that there is such a an analogy<\/p>\n
The notions of analogy, authority, causality, and definition appear, by one name or another, in all collections of arguments.<\/p>\n
These concepts fall into two types of argumentations.<\/p>\n
First step,<\/strong> <\/span>it must be shown that the relationship actually exists, if you want to exploit it later.<\/p>\n Stasis (1):<\/p>\n The existence of the relationship has to be proved through arguments that base, establish, construct<\/strong>, justify the answers given to these question.<\/p>\n The arguments and counter-arguments rely on the application of shared criteria methods and test for what is a proven causal link, a strong analogy, a true authority, and a substantial definition<\/p>\n Second step<\/strong><\/span>, this relationship can be exploited in argumentation from causality, analogy, authority or definition.\u00a0 For example, if the answer are positive:<\/p>\n \u2026 so, it would be wise to limit\u00a0 their use<\/p>\n \u2026 so, we must expect considerable political upheaval<\/p>\n \u2026 so, I will invest my money with them.<\/p>\n \u2026 so, why should I worry about all these elections fuss?<\/p>\n It is possible to admit that there is a causal link and tha<\/p>\n A radical rebuttal to these claims is to show that the underlying causal relationship\u00a0 doesnot hold true ;\u00a0 the analogy does not hold; \u00a0 the authority is a sham; the definition is ridiculous.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Constructing \/ exploiting a reality arguing to construct a relation or a property \u2014 arguing from a relation, appealing to a relation or a property Four basic relations and properties : argumentative construction and argumentative exploitation Four basic argument schemes Before living in a house, you must first build it. Before using an analogy, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6160"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6768,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6160\/revisions\/6768"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/dicoplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n\n
\n Is there<\/td>\n a causal relationship between fact A and fact B?<\/td>\n Are pesticides risk factors for certain cancers?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n <\/td>\n an analogical relationship between fact A and fact B?<\/td>\n Is there an analogy between the 1929 and 2008 crises?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Is such source<\/td>\n an authority?<\/td>\n Is Uncle Srooge an authority on financial investments?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Is this discourse<\/td>\n a definition of the word W<\/strong>?<\/td>\n Is having an iPhone and three meals a day a satisfactory definition of democracy?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n