{"id":1330,"date":"2022-04-24T19:28:26","date_gmt":"2022-04-24T17:28:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/?page_id=1330"},"modified":"2022-04-24T19:29:24","modified_gmt":"2022-04-24T17:29:24","slug":"emotive-communication","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/emotive-communication\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cTowards a pragmatics of emotive communication\u201d (Caffi, Janney 1994)"},"content":{"rendered":"
3. Dimensions psychologiques et dimensions langagi\u00e8res des \u00e9motions<\/strong><\/pre>\n
La question des \u00e9motions a \u00e9t\u00e9 discut\u00e9e par Caffi et Janney\u00a0(1994a et 1994b), dans le cadre d\u2019une pragmatique vue comme \u00abthe place where [linguistic and psychology] could finally and fruitfully meet, partly through the medium of rhetoric\u00bb (1994a, p. 247). Reprenant \u00e0 Marty la distinction \u00e9motif\/\u00e9motionnel (voir Chapitre 8), Caffi et Janney montrent comment l\u2019inves\u00adtigation linguistique sur la \u00abcommunication \u00e9motive\u00bb peut s\u2019orienter selon les trois cat\u00e9gories de l\u2019\u00e9valuation<\/em>, de la quantit\u00e9<\/em> et du contr\u00f4le<\/em>, bien connues des psychologues (1994, p. 338). La liste introduit notamment la dimension du contr\u00f4le<\/em>, qui joue un r\u00f4le essentiel dans la construction diff\u00e9renci\u00e9e des \u00e9motions. Cet axe est le plus complexe, il lui correspond quatre cat\u00e9gories linguistiques: \u00abproximity, specificity, evidentiality, volitionality\u00bb.<\/p>\n
Ces cat\u00e9gories psychologiques sont mises en parall\u00e8le avec six cat\u00e9gories linguistiques, chacune correspondant \u00e0 une opposition type que nous reproduisons ci-dessous (d\u2019apr\u00e8s Caffi et Janney 1994b).<\/p>\n
Tableau 3: <\/em>Les dimensions de la communication \u00e9motive<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Psychological categories<\/strong><\/td>\nLinguistic categories<\/strong><\/td>\nMain contrast<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
evaluation<\/td>\nevaluation<\/td>\npositive \/ negative<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nproximity<\/td>\nnear \/ far<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
control<\/td>\nspecificity<\/td>\nclear \/ vague<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nevidentiality<\/td>\nconfident \/ doubtful<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nvolitionality<\/td>\nassertive \/ non assertive<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
quantity<\/td>\nquantit\u00e9<\/td>\nmore \/ less intense<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
 <\/p>\n
La strat\u00e9gie de recherche consiste alors \u00e0 d\u00e9terminer, pour chacune de ces six cat\u00e9gories la liste des indices linguistiques [emotive devices] auxquels elle correspond. Par exemple, la dimension essentielle \u201c\u00e9valuation\u201d est d\u00e9finie comme \u00aball types of verbal and non verbal choices that suggest an inferable positive or negative evaluative stance on the part of the speaker with respect to a topic, part of a topic, a partner or partners in discourse\u00bb (1994b, p. 354); elle regroupe \u00aball discourse activities which can be interpreted as indices of pleasure or displeasure, agreement or disagreement, like or dislike, and so forth, e. g.: smiling vs<\/em> frowning facial expression, friendly vs<\/em> hostile voice qualities, choice of emotion terms, evaluative vocatives, diminutives [\u2026]\u00bb (1994b, p. 356)<\/p>\n
 <\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n
Caffi, Cl. (2000): \u00abAspects du calibrage des distances e\u0301motives entre rhe\u0301torique et<\/p>\n
psychologie\u00bb. In Plantin, Ch, Doury, M., Traverso, V. (e\u0301ds), 2000. 89-104.
\nCaffi, Cl., Janney, R. W. (1994a): \u00abIntroduction: Planning a bridge\u00bb. Journal of prag-<\/p>\n
matics 21. 245-249.
\nCaffi, Cl., Janney, R. W. (1994b): \u00abToward a pragmatics of emotive communication\u00bb. Journal of pragmatics 21. 325-373.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
3. Dimensions psychologiques et dimensions langagi\u00e8res des \u00e9motions La question des \u00e9motions a \u00e9t\u00e9 discut\u00e9e par Caffi et Janney\u00a0(1994a et 1994b), dans le cadre d\u2019une pragmatique vue comme \u00abthe place where [linguistic and psychology] could finally and fruitfully meet, partly … Continuer la lecture →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1330","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1330","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1330"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1330\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1333,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1330\/revisions\/1333"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}