{"id":1530,"date":"2022-05-17T13:10:46","date_gmt":"2022-05-17T11:10:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/?p=1530"},"modified":"2022-05-17T13:37:05","modified_gmt":"2022-05-17T11:37:05","slug":"affect-cognition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/affect-cognition\/","title":{"rendered":"Affect et cognition"},"content":{"rendered":"

LANGAGE, COGNITION ET CONSTRUCTION DES AFFECTS<\/span><\/h1>\n

Toutes les op\u00e9rations de construction des affects impliquent indissociablement langage et cognition.<\/p>\n

Selon certaines approches, l\u2019\u00e9motion perturbe le fonctionnement cognitif:<\/p>\n

just as an emotion affects body processes and the perceptual process, so too it affects the person\u2019s memory, thinking, and imagination. The \u201ctunnel vision\u201d effect in perception has a parallel in the realm of cognition. The frightened person has difficulty considering the whole field and examining various alternatives. In anger, the person is inclined to have only angry thoughts. (Izard 1977, p. 10).<\/p>\n

D\u2019autres approches adoptent une vision plus positive du r\u00f4le de la cognition dans l\u2019\u00e9motion. D\u2019une part, pour d\u00e9clencher de l\u2019\u00e9motion, les \u00e9v\u00e9nements ext\u00e9rieurs doivent \u00eatre per\u00e7us: la premi\u00e8re forme de cognition impliqu\u00e9e dans l\u2019\u00e9motion est donc de l\u2019ordre de la perception. La nature de l\u2019\u00e9motion d\u00e9pend ensuite de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de l\u2019\u00e9v\u00e9nement et de son \u00e9valuation, conditionn\u00e9es par l\u2019histoire du sujet, de son syst\u00e8me de repr\u00e9sentations, de valeurs. C\u2019est un point fondamental.<\/p>\n

La d\u00e9finition pr\u00e9cise de ce qu\u2019il faut entendre par cognition et \u00e9valuation est en d\u00e9bat. Zajonc remarque que<\/p>\n

appraisal and affect are often uncorrelated and disjoint [\u2026] If cognitive appraisal is a necessary determinant of affect, then changing appraisal should result in a change of affect. This is most frequently not so, and persuasion is one of the weakest methods of attitude change\u00bb (Zajonc 1984, p.\u00a0264).<\/p>\n

La relation entre cognition psychologique et processus rationnels conscients reste \u00e0 \u00e9tablir:<\/p>\n

the cognitive activity in appraisal does not imply anything about deliberate reflection, rationality, or awareness\u00a0\u2026 Zajonc, like many others, also seems to erroneously equate cognition with rationality\u00bb (Lazarus 1984, p. 252)<\/p>\n

Cognition cannot be equated with rationality. The cognitive appraisals that shape our emotional reactions can distort reality as well as reflect it realistically (op. cit.<\/em>, p.\u00a0253).<\/p>\n

Zajonc\u2019s argument is only sensible if cognition is defined as conscious propositional thinking. All other cognition, such as perceptual categorization and nonconscious cognitive enrichment are, by his definition, non cognitive. (Leventhal 1984, p. 281).<\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

On peut consid\u00e9rer que les op\u00e9rations langagi\u00e8res, qui constituent la composante discursive du traitement des stimuli \u00e9motionnels, sont la trace d\u2019op\u00e9rations cognitives \u201cplus profondes\u201d, ind\u00e9pendantes du langage, ce qui oriente vers une vision du langage reflet, et, sinon \u00e0 une n\u00e9gation, du moins \u00e0 une minoration de l\u2019autonomie de l\u2019ordre du discours.
\nOn peut \u00e9galement consid\u00e9rer que les op\u00e9rations linguistiques provoquent des \u00e9bauches de processus cognitifs, avec les difficult\u00e9s sym\u00e9triques.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

LANGAGE, COGNITION ET CONSTRUCTION DES AFFECTS Toutes les op\u00e9rations de construction des affects impliquent indissociablement langage et cognition. Selon certaines approches, l\u2019\u00e9motion perturbe le fonctionnement cognitif: just as an emotion affects body processes and the perceptual process, so too it … Continuer la lecture →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":97,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1530","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/97"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1530"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1530\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1540,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1530\/revisions\/1540"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1530"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icar.cnrs.fr\/membre\/cplantin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}